* [rfc/testsuite] asm-source.exp: convert debug_flags
@ 2004-07-30 5:59 Michael Chastain
2004-07-30 11:59 ` Nick Clifton
2004-07-30 14:02 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Chastain @ 2004-07-30 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kettenis, gdb-patches; +Cc: nickc
Okay, how about this?
I added a comment that debug_flags is in the format that gcc expects,
and that the test script adjusts to the format that the assembler
expects.
Also I strip out "-g2" and "-g3" because as soon as I ran my testbed
I noticed that my testbed provides those.
Tested on native i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.3.4 and binutils 2.15
with the following flags:
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="asm-source.exp"
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-2 asm-source.exp"
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf2 asm-source.exp"
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gstabs+ asm-source.exp"
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gstabs asm-source.exp"
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gstabs+\\\\\\ -g2 asm-source.exp"
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/gdb:debug_flags=-g3\\\\\\ -gdwarf-2 asm-source.exp"
Mark, does this patch work for you too? If it does, I'll commit it.
Michael C
2004-07-29 Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
* gdb.base/asm-source.exp: Properly convert target board
debug flags from gcc format to binutils format.
Index: asm-source.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.asm/asm-source.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -c -3 -p -r1.51 asm-source.exp
*** asm-source.exp 27 Jul 2004 09:28:42 -0000 1.51
--- asm-source.exp 30 Jul 2004 05:57:33 -0000
*************** switch -glob -- [istarget] {
*** 77,87 ****
}
"m6811-*-*" {
set asm-arch m68hc11
! set asm-flags "-mshort-double -m68hc11 -gdwarf2 --no-warn -I${srcdir}/${subdir} -I${objdir}/${subdir}"
}
"m6812-*-*" {
set asm-arch m68hc11
! set asm-flags "-mshort-double -m68hc12 -gdwarf2 --no-warn -I${srcdir}/${subdir} -I${objdir}/${subdir}"
}
"mips*-*" {
set asm-arch mips
--- 77,87 ----
}
"m6811-*-*" {
set asm-arch m68hc11
! set asm-flags "-mshort-double -m68hc11 -gdwarf-2 --no-warn -I${srcdir}/${subdir} -I${objdir}/${subdir}"
}
"m6812-*-*" {
set asm-arch m68hc11
! set asm-flags "-mshort-double -m68hc12 -gdwarf-2 --no-warn -I${srcdir}/${subdir} -I${objdir}/${subdir}"
}
"mips*-*" {
set asm-arch mips
*************** if { "${asm-flags}" == "" } {
*** 173,187 ****
set debug-flags "-gstabs"
}
! # Allow the target board to override the debug flags
if { [board_info $dest exists debug_flags] } then {
set debug-flags "[board_info $dest debug_flags]"
}
! # The GNU assembler does not support STABS+
! if { ${debug-flags} == "-gstabs+" } then {
! set debug-flags "-gstabs"
! }
if {[target_assemble ${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile1} asmsrc1.o "${asm-flags} ${debug-flags}"] != ""} then {
gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
--- 173,202 ----
set debug-flags "-gstabs"
}
! # Allow the target board to override the debug flags.
if { [board_info $dest exists debug_flags] } then {
set debug-flags "[board_info $dest debug_flags]"
}
! # The debug flags are in the format that gcc expects:
! # "-gdwarf-2", "-gstabs+", or "-gstabs". To be compatible with the
! # other languages in the test suite, we accept this input format.
! # So the user can run the test suite with:
! #
! # runtest --target_board unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-2
! # make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-2"
! #
! # However, the GNU assembler has different spellings than gcc.
! # So I adjust the debug flags here.
!
! # The GNU assembler spells "dwarf-2" as "dwarf2".
! regsub "--" "-gdwarf-2" "${debug-flags}" "-gdwarf2" debug-flags
!
! # The GNU assembler before 2.15 did not support "stabs+".
! regsub "--" "-gstabs\[+\]" "${debug-flags}" "-gstabs" debug-flags
!
! # The GNU assembler does not support level options like "-g2" or "-g3".
! regsub "--" "-g\[0-9\]" "${debug-flags}" "" debug-flags
if {[target_assemble ${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile1} asmsrc1.o "${asm-flags} ${debug-flags}"] != ""} then {
gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [rfc/testsuite] asm-source.exp: convert debug_flags
2004-07-30 5:59 [rfc/testsuite] asm-source.exp: convert debug_flags Michael Chastain
@ 2004-07-30 11:59 ` Nick Clifton
2004-07-30 12:18 ` Michael Chastain
2004-07-30 14:02 ` Mark Kettenis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2004-07-30 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Chastain; +Cc: kettenis, gdb-patches
Hi Michael,
Darn - I should have read all of my email before replying to Mark.
> 2004-07-29 Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
>
> * gdb.base/asm-source.exp: Properly convert target board
> debug flags from gcc format to binutils format.
This patch is much better than mine, so I withdraw my patch.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfc/testsuite] asm-source.exp: convert debug_flags
2004-07-30 11:59 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2004-07-30 12:18 ` Michael Chastain
2004-07-30 15:17 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Chastain @ 2004-07-30 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nickc; +Cc: kettenis, gdb-patches
Nick Clifton writes:
> This patch is much better than mine, so I withdraw my patch.
Okay.
I'm feeling paranoid, so could I ask you to give my patch a spin on your
system, with whatever binutils you have? I'd like to bury this PITA.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfc/testsuite] asm-source.exp: convert debug_flags
2004-07-30 12:18 ` Michael Chastain
@ 2004-07-30 15:17 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2004-07-30 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Chastain; +Cc: kettenis, gdb-patches
Hi Michael,
> I'm feeling paranoid, so could I ask you to give my patch a spin on your
> system, with whatever binutils you have? I'd like to bury this PITA.
I have just applied your patch locally and run several tests (x86
native, sh-elf and xstormy16-elf crosses) - no problems whatsoever.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfc/testsuite] asm-source.exp: convert debug_flags
2004-07-30 5:59 [rfc/testsuite] asm-source.exp: convert debug_flags Michael Chastain
2004-07-30 11:59 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2004-07-30 14:02 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-30 22:12 ` Michael Chastain
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2004-07-30 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mec.gnu; +Cc: gdb-patches, nickc
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:00:01 -0400
From: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Okay, how about this?
2004-07-29 Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
* gdb.base/asm-source.exp: Properly convert target board
debug flags from gcc format to binutils format.
Works fine for me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-30 22:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-30 5:59 [rfc/testsuite] asm-source.exp: convert debug_flags Michael Chastain
2004-07-30 11:59 ` Nick Clifton
2004-07-30 12:18 ` Michael Chastain
2004-07-30 15:17 ` Nick Clifton
2004-07-30 14:02 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-30 22:12 ` Michael Chastain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox