From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: traditional sigtramp system?
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 22:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <406DEB2C.3020700@gnu.org> (raw)
Hello,
Can anyone point me at a "more traditional" signal trampoline system?
Where traditional means that, when delivering a signal, the program is
resumed at the first instruction of the signal trampoline, and not the
first instruction of the signal handler (as is now often the case).
The frame unwinders appear to have made huge chunks of infrun's signal
trampoline logic redundant and I'd prefer to have a system that I can
test it on.
Andrew
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-02 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-02 22:37 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-04-04 16:26 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=406DEB2C.3020700@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox