From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23064 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2004 22:37:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23056 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2004 22:37:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2004 22:37:31 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i32MbVjl013653 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:37:31 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i32MbUj11990; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:37:31 -0500 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5872B92; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:37:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <406DEB2C.3020700@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 22:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: traditional sigtramp system? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 Hello, Can anyone point me at a "more traditional" signal trampoline system? Where traditional means that, when delivering a signal, the program is resumed at the first instruction of the signal trampoline, and not the first instruction of the signal handler (as is now often the case). The frame unwinders appear to have made huge chunks of infrun's signal trampoline logic redundant and I'd prefer to have a system that I can test it on. Andrew