Re: RFC patch mi-cmds.c table format (pedantic)

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>]

> 
> On Mar 18, 2004, at 11:55 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> First, have a look at:
>> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gdb&pr=496
> 
> 
> Ah, I hadn't seen that.
> 
> How do you envision the cli-mapped mi commands working (e.g. -gdb-set),  where files in the gdb/ directory are registering the commands?

There shouldn't be cli-mapped mi commands.  Both the MI and CLI should 
share a common framework.  However, in the mean time, I guess such a 
table should be pump-primed with all the cli-mapped mi entries.

> OK I'll come up with a real/tested patch.  The trailing initializers --  you don't mean this kind of change, do you?
> 
>>> -  { "exec-step", { NULL, 0 }, mi_cmd_exec_step},
>>> +  { "exec-step", { NULL, 0 }, mi_cmd_exec_step, NULL},
> 
> 
> I think you were talking about the final NULL entry.

Skip them as well, I don't see the benefit.

Andrew