Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Per-architecture DWARF CFI register state initialization hooks
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <402FCD3C.3040900@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040215180922.GA30368@nevyn.them.org>

> 
> Since I am obviously not getting it, could someone explain to me what
> the modularity advantage is?

Are you asking why modularity, in general, is advantage, or why here 
specifically this is more modula and hence an advantage?

The dwarf2-frame is able to locally, and opaquely (to other components) 
implement the per-architecture mechanisms that it needs.  No need to 
bloat that architecture vector with yet another global interface that 
nothing, other than dwarf2-frame requires.  No need to publish anything 
other than what is specificly relevant to dwarf2-frame's clients - the 
dwarf2 initialize routine.

> All I see is a function pointer, with a default value or overridden by
> the architecture initialization, used to parametrize a module's
> behavior.  That is the same niche as every existing member of the
> gdbarch vector.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-15 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-07 22:38 Mark Kettenis
2004-02-07 23:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-07 23:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-15 15:31   ` Mark Kettenis
2004-02-15 16:04     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-15 18:09       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-15 19:49         ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-02-15 20:37           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-15 21:37             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-15 22:54               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-15 21:31       ` Mark Kettenis
2004-02-08  1:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-02-16  1:28 Ulrich Weigand
2004-02-16  1:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-16 13:01   ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-02-16 19:47     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-16 20:50       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-16 20:55         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-18 16:59           ` Mark Kettenis
2004-02-18 18:40             ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=402FCD3C.3040900@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox