Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Per-architecture DWARF CFI register state initialization hooks
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 23:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040207230330.GA6717@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200402072237.i17Mbqae011375@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>

On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 11:37:52PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Here's my proposal for the per-architecture DWARF CFI register state
> initialization hooks needed for S/390, and others.  This is a RFC,
> since I'm not entirely confident whether my approach is acceptable.  I
> chose to implement this using per-architecture data instead of adding
> a function to the architecture vector.  I think it is cleaner since it
> keeps things localized and modular, and the architecture vector is big
> enough as it stands.  However you folks might think otherwise.

Hmm, I do.  You're adding a per-architecture data item which is a
function pointer, and what amounts to the rest of what gdbarch.sh would
generate (wrapper functions, default initialization.  I'd rather you
just used gdbarch.sh.

> Ulrich, this should privide the hooks you need.  For S/390 you should
> provide a function with the following signature:
> 
> void
> s390_dwarf2_frame_init_reg (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum,
>                             struct gdbarch dwarf2_frame_state_reg *reg);
> 
> and initialize REG according to your needs for the REGNUMs you care
> about.  Note that REGNUM is the GDB register number.
> 
> Comments?

I've no objection.  I would have done something like:

void
gdbarch_dwarf2_frame_init_reg (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
			       struct dwarf3_frame_state_reg *reg);

  dwarf2_frame_default_init_reg (reg);
  gdbarch_dwarf2_frame_init_reg (gdbarch, reg);

but this is just as good, and we're not _that_ pinched for startup
time.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-07 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-07 22:38 Mark Kettenis
2004-02-07 23:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-02-07 23:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-15 15:31   ` Mark Kettenis
2004-02-15 16:04     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-15 18:09       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-15 19:49         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-15 20:37           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-15 21:37             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-15 22:54               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-15 21:31       ` Mark Kettenis
2004-02-08  1:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-02-16  1:28 Ulrich Weigand
2004-02-16  1:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-16 13:01   ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-02-16 19:47     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-16 20:50       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-16 20:55         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-18 16:59           ` Mark Kettenis
2004-02-18 18:40             ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040207230330.GA6717@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox