Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bug with watchpoints on Linux
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20011130161336.01698ae8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1190-Wed21Nov2001202555+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>

At 19:25 21/11/2001 , Eli Zaretskii a écrit:
> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:01:59 +0100
> > From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
> > 
> >    But at the second run, the program is never stopped because
> > of the changes to this global variable.
> > 
> >    It seems like there is a problem with the hardware watchpoint
> > resetting.
> > 
> >    I tested this on only one Linux machine,
> > but both the main and the 5.1 branches show this problem.
>
>The DJGPP port doesn't have this problem.

   Nevertheless, according to my debug,
I expect that most targets using 
i386 hardware watchpoints and 
not calling i386_cleanup_dregs
will show this problem.

   I think that this is a really nasty bug for 
the i386 linux target for 5.1 release....

    What do we do about this?
I proposed to add a call to i386_cleanup_dregs
for all targets using the standard 
i386 hardware watchpoints, but 
Eli seems still not convinced by my reports....





Pierre Muller
Institut Charles Sadron
6,rue Boussingault
F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France)
mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07  Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bug with watchpoints on Linux
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20011130161336.01698ae8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
Message-ID: <20011121161900.QipA_NTviGWiX6kjjl3FENuhJMtLkSuc2aLSNthHKhE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1190-Wed21Nov2001202555+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>

At 19:25 21/11/2001 , Eli Zaretskii a écrit:
> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:01:59 +0100
> > From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
> > 
> >    But at the second run, the program is never stopped because
> > of the changes to this global variable.
> > 
> >    It seems like there is a problem with the hardware watchpoint
> > resetting.
> > 
> >    I tested this on only one Linux machine,
> > but both the main and the 5.1 branches show this problem.
>
>The DJGPP port doesn't have this problem.

   Nevertheless, according to my debug,
I expect that most targets using 
i386 hardware watchpoints and 
not calling i386_cleanup_dregs
will show this problem.

   I think that this is a really nasty bug for 
the i386 linux target for 5.1 release....

    What do we do about this?
I proposed to add a call to i386_cleanup_dregs
for all targets using the standard 
i386 hardware watchpoints, but 
Eli seems still not convinced by my reports....





Pierre Muller
Institut Charles Sadron
6,rue Boussingault
F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France)
mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07  Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99


       reply	other threads:[~2001-11-30  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4.2.0.58.20011121124943.00a4a288@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
     [not found] ` <1190-Wed21Nov2001202555+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
2001-11-30  7:18   ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2001-11-21 16:19     ` Pierre Muller
2001-11-21 16:50     ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-11-21 17:07       ` [RFC] Possible bug with i386 watchpoints on several targets Pierre Muller
2001-11-30  8:06         ` Pierre Muller
2001-11-30 11:48         ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-11-23  6:39           ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-12-03  1:33           ` Pierre Muller
2001-12-03  3:10             ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-12-04  4:09               ` Pierre Muller
2001-12-04 23:50           ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-12-05  1:31             ` Pierre Muller
2001-12-05  3:23               ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-12-05  3:55                 ` Pierre Muller
2001-11-30  7:45       ` Bug with watchpoints on Linux Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4.2.0.58.20011130161336.01698ae8@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
    --to=muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox