* [patch/rfc/testsuite] Fix read-only fileio test on GNU/Linux
@ 2004-01-05 20:01 Andrew Cagney
2004-01-07 16:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-26 11:46 ` Corinna Vinschen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-01-05 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 362 bytes --]
Hello,
I think this deserves a "how did this ever work" award :-)
The file was being created writeable (the S_IWUSR flag passed to open())
so little wonder GNU/Linux allowed an open-write (causing the test to
fail) and who knows how/who this worked on BSD and remote systems.
Tested on BSD and GNU/Linux. Baring comment I'll commit in a day or so.
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 760 bytes --]
2004-01-05 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/fileio.c (test_open): Do not pass S_IWUSR to "open"
when creating the read-only file. From analysis by Roland McGrath
and Elena Zannoni.
Index: gdb.base/fileio.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/fileio.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 fileio.c
--- gdb.base/fileio.c 2 Jan 2004 22:53:12 -0000 1.4
+++ gdb.base/fileio.c 5 Jan 2004 19:52:39 -0000
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
close (ret);
/* Open for write but no write permission */
errno = 0;
- ret = open (NOWRITE, O_CREAT | O_RDONLY, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
+ ret = open (NOWRITE, O_CREAT | O_RDONLY, S_IRUSR);
if (ret >= 0)
{
close (ret);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [patch/rfc/testsuite] Fix read-only fileio test on GNU/Linux
2004-01-05 20:01 [patch/rfc/testsuite] Fix read-only fileio test on GNU/Linux Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-01-07 16:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-26 11:46 ` Corinna Vinschen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-01-07 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Hello,
>
> I think this deserves a "how did this ever work" award :-)
>
> The file was being created writeable (the S_IWUSR flag passed to open()) so little wonder GNU/Linux allowed an open-write (causing the test to fail) and who knows how/who this worked on BSD and remote systems.
>
> Tested on BSD and GNU/Linux. Baring comment I'll commit in a day or so.
Committed. This leaves just:
FAIL: gdb.base/fileio.exp: Renaming a directory to a non-empty directory
returns ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST
I'll follow that up shortly.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch/rfc/testsuite] Fix read-only fileio test on GNU/Linux
2004-01-05 20:01 [patch/rfc/testsuite] Fix read-only fileio test on GNU/Linux Andrew Cagney
2004-01-07 16:04 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-01-26 11:46 ` Corinna Vinschen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Corinna Vinschen @ 2004-01-26 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Jan 5 15:01, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think this deserves a "how did this ever work" award :-)
>
> The file was being created writeable (the S_IWUSR flag passed to open())
> so little wonder GNU/Linux allowed an open-write (causing the test to
> fail) and who knows how/who this worked on BSD and remote systems.
>
> Tested on BSD and GNU/Linux. Baring comment I'll commit in a day or so.
It's late but nevertheless, thanks. I compared with my original sources
from end of 2002 in which I used just S_IRUSR. I'm still wondering why
and when I added S_IWUSR before submitting this patch to FSF. Oh boy...
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-26 11:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-05 20:01 [patch/rfc/testsuite] Fix read-only fileio test on GNU/Linux Andrew Cagney
2004-01-07 16:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-26 11:46 ` Corinna Vinschen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox