Re: [rfa/testsuite/PING] asm-source.exp: use UNTESTED

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>]

> ac> However, remember why this test was originally changed to fail messy - 
> ac> the test was being skipped and, as a demonstratable consequence, 
> ac> everyone chose to ignore it rather than fix the testcase :-(
> 
> Well, I'm choosing to ignore it for native hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11,
> until after function calls work, and C++ works, and the internal
> hp_aCC_compiler variable works, and the other 200 ERRORs and
> 2000 FAILs have gotten some attention.
> 
> It's just annoying to open up gdb.log and the first 4 ERRORs and 5
> WARNINGs are things that I know I won't fix this month.  I keep having
> to look past this to get to more important problems.
> 
> ac> What about UNTESTED, and then KFAIL everything?  Knowing my luck that 
> ac> will be much harder than it seems ...

Prior to "gdb_supress_entire_file", what was this test reporting when 
the code was missing?

> That's what gdb_suppress_entire_file is supposed to do now, but it
> doesn't work.  It sets a little state variable that is supposed to FAIL
> every test in the current file.  But I still get a slow of
> ERROR/WARNING on top of the 28 FAILs.
> 
> If I can't change asm-source.exp, I guess I'll just keep ignoring
> the results by hand.  At least it's not incurring timeouts.

Andrew