From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] mips-o64-extract-return-value
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 01:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FBEB549.1060401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FBEAA0B.90005@gnu.org>
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>
>> Right -- I meant *these* changelog entries:
>>
>> [msnyder@reddwarf gdb]$ grep sysv_abi_return_value ChangeLog
>> * ppc-tdep.h (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto.
>> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto.
>> (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto.
>> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto.
>> * ppc-sysv-tdep.c (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): New function.
>> * ppc-tdep.h (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare.
>> (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare.
>> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): New function.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I'm lost. What's wrong with those ChangeLogs?
>>
>> s/abi_return_value/abi_store_return_value/g
>
>
> What?
;-)
Honest, I didn't mean to make a federal case out of this --
your original suggestion to me was to look for a function called
"ppc_sysv_abi_return_value". That function doesn't exist -- but
there are several references to it in the changelog. I eventually
figured out that it was missing the word "store_", as in
"store_return_value". So I asked if you'd like me to fix up
the change log entries, so they would match the actual function name.
Sorry for the confusion...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-22 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-20 1:08 Michael Snyder
2003-11-20 1:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-20 21:28 ` Michael Snyder
2003-11-20 21:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-21 1:04 ` Michael Snyder
2003-11-21 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-21 21:53 ` Michael Snyder
2003-11-22 0:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-22 1:01 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2003-11-22 1:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-25 22:04 ` Michael Snyder
2003-11-25 22:15 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FBEB549.1060401@redhat.com \
--to=msnyder@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox