From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-28800-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9475 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2003 01:01:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9463 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2003 01:01:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2003 01:01:00 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged))
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAM10xH11459
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:00:59 -0500
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAM10wa06734;
	Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:00:58 -0500
Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAM10vH17528;
	Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:00:57 -0800
Message-ID: <3FBEB549.1060401@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 01:01:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
CC: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] mips-o64-extract-return-value
References: <3FBC13EC.1040202@redhat.com> <3FBC1782.3000908@gnu.org> <3FBD31F5.6080201@redhat.com> <3FBD3819.1020302@gnu.org> <3FBD6497.9040600@redhat.com> <3FBE39CB.8030203@redhat.com> <3FBE893B.2030300@redhat.com> <3FBEAA0B.90005@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <3FBEAA0B.90005@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>
>> Right -- I meant *these* changelog entries:
>>
>> [msnyder@reddwarf gdb]$ grep sysv_abi_return_value ChangeLog
>>     * ppc-tdep.h (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto.
>>     (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto.
>>     (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto.
>>     (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto.
>>     * ppc-sysv-tdep.c (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): New function.
>>     * ppc-tdep.h (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare.
>>     (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare.
>>     (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): New function.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I'm lost.  What's wrong with those ChangeLogs?
>>
>> s/abi_return_value/abi_store_return_value/g 
> 
> 
> What?

;-)
Honest, I didn't mean to make a federal case out of this --
your original suggestion to me was to look for a function called
"ppc_sysv_abi_return_value".  That function doesn't exist -- but
there are several references to it in the changelog.  I eventually
figured out that it was missing the word "store_", as in
"store_return_value".  So I asked if you'd like me to fix up
the change log entries, so they would match the actual function name.

Sorry for the confusion...