From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: selected frame in read_var_value
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F5C852D.2010207@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030907035325.GA9985@nevyn.them.org>
> Is this about what you wanted, and are my comments on the mark?
Yes, just one pedantic tweak.
> If so, how do you feel about a mass replacement of the one deprecated
> construct (deprecated_selected_frame) with the new deprecated construct
> (deprecated_safe_get_selected_frame) in the places in GDB which use
> this "if frame arg is NULL, get selected frame" idiom?
For 6.0, scares the peverbial out of me -> got a convincing argument?
:-) For the mainline, not phased.
Andrew
> +/* This is a variant of get_selected_frame which can be called when the
> + inferior is not running; in that case it will return NULL instead of
> + calling error (). */
Almost. Those are also true for a core file.
> +struct frame_info *
> +deprecated_safe_get_selected_frame (void)
> +{
> + if (!target_has_registers || !target_has_stack || !target_has_memory)
> + return NULL;
> + return get_selected_frame ();
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-08 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-01 19:29 Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-07 17:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-28 19:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-05 17:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-05 17:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-05 17:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-07 3:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-08 13:33 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-09-08 13:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-08 18:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-08 4:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-08 17:33 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F5C852D.2010207@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox