Re: [RFA] testsuite cleanups (part 2)

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>]

Elena Zannoni wrote:

>Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
> > eza> [PS. I assume I used the correct autoconf, but I am nost sure: I used the
> > eza> autoconf-000227 snapshot].
> > 
> > ms> In view of the large diffs in configure, I suspect this is indeed the
> > ms> wrong version of autoconf. The rest of the change is approved. If you
> > ms> don't easily solve the autoconf issue, you might consider leaving
> > ms> configure alone -- it's just an extra test...
> > 
> > A little sniffing indicates that the last commit to 'configure.in'
> > used autoconf 2.13 to generate 'configure'.  That's where the diff
> > is coming from.
>
>I think that 000227 also brands itself as 2.13. I think this may be
>where the confusion comes from, the configure file tells you
>"configure generated by autoconf version 2.13" in both cases.
>
> > 
> > So either the blessed version has changed, or the last commit to
> > 'configure.in' was done with the wrong autoconf.
> > 
> > I agree it might be useful to split the patch, if we can't get a
> > quick resolution to "which autoconf is blessed".
> > 
>
>Ok, this issue seems to be resolved now. Let me know when I can commit,
>or not :-).
>

Go. ;-)