From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 682 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 21:57:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 674 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 21:57:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 21:57:04 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6TLv3Z25171 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:57:04 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6TLv2619533; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:57:02 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6TLv2K31432; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:57:02 -0700 Message-ID: <3F26EDAE.8080706@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:57:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni CC: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite cleanups (part 2) References: <200307292135.h6TLZqNs017920@duracef.shout.net> <16166.60688.682284.636713@localhost.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <16166.60688.682284.636713@localhost.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00533.txt.bz2 Elena Zannoni wrote: >Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > > eza> [PS. I assume I used the correct autoconf, but I am nost sure: I used the > > eza> autoconf-000227 snapshot]. > > > > ms> In view of the large diffs in configure, I suspect this is indeed the > > ms> wrong version of autoconf. The rest of the change is approved. If you > > ms> don't easily solve the autoconf issue, you might consider leaving > > ms> configure alone -- it's just an extra test... > > > > A little sniffing indicates that the last commit to 'configure.in' > > used autoconf 2.13 to generate 'configure'. That's where the diff > > is coming from. > >I think that 000227 also brands itself as 2.13. I think this may be >where the confusion comes from, the configure file tells you >"configure generated by autoconf version 2.13" in both cases. > > > > > So either the blessed version has changed, or the last commit to > > 'configure.in' was done with the wrong autoconf. > > > > I agree it might be useful to split the patch, if we can't get a > > quick resolution to "which autoconf is blessed". > > > >Ok, this issue seems to be resolved now. Let me know when I can commit, >or not :-). > Go. ;-)