Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [cagney_convert-20030606-branch] Add value to REGISTER_TO_VALUE et.al.
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 00:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EE3D336.1080108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200306082250.h58Mow31022350@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>


> And what do these functions do if the register is unavailable in a
> certain frame?  That shouldn't happen if we have complete debug
> information, but unfortunately we almost certainly don't have that.
> Should this be reported to the user or not?  Should we set
> VALUE_OPTIMIZED_OUT, just as we do for registers that don't need
> conversion?  If so, we probably need a return value that indicates
> whether the conversion was successfull.

I've got into the habit of ignoring OPTIMIZED_OUT, for registers it's 
always cleared (well ignoring the recent CFI stuff).  It was added 
between 3.5 and 3.93 but for no apparent reason (at least for 
registers).  The ChangeLog's are not very enlightenting and this 
pre-dates Cygnus CVS.

Anyway, the question of what to do when the register's value can't be 
found has been largely ignored.  I'm thinking that throwing an error 
would be a safer strategy - there is too much code ignoring register 
fetches and I don't think we're going to be auditing it soon.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-09  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-04 19:38 [wip/rfc] Merge REGISTER_TO_VALUE and REGISTER_TO_TYPE Andrew Cagney
2003-06-04 21:45 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-06-04 23:05   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-06 18:12   ` [cagney_convert-20030606-branch] Add value to REGISTER_TO_VALUE et.al Andrew Cagney
2003-06-08 16:43     ` Mark Kettenis
2003-06-08 17:15       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-08 22:11         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-08 22:51           ` Mark Kettenis
2003-06-09  0:22             ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-06-09  9:35               ` Mark Kettenis
2003-06-09 14:38                 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-09  9:38           ` Mark Kettenis
2003-06-09 14:20             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-09 17:43               ` Mark Kettenis
2003-06-09 10:26           ` Mark Kettenis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EE3D336.1080108@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox