Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove calls to inside_entry_file
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 13:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E8EE0A6.4070403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030403131734.GN18138@cygbert.vinschen.de>


>> might be the best option.  What about moving this:
>> 
> 
>> > +
>> > +  /* If the architecture has a custom FRAME_CHAIN_VALID, call it 
> 
>> now.  */
> 
>> > +  if (FRAME_CHAIN_VALID_P ())
>> > +    return FRAME_CHAIN_VALID (fp, fi);
> 
>> 
>> to before this:
>> 
>> +  /* If we're already inside the entry function for the main objfile, 
>> then it
>> +     isn't valid.  */
>> +  if (inside_entry_func (get_frame_pc (fi)))
>> +    return 0;
>> +
>> +  /* If we're inside the entry file, it isn't valid.  */
>> +  /* NOTE/drow 2002-12-25: should there be a way to disable this check?  It
>> +     assumes a single small entry file, and the way some debug readers 
>> (e.g.
>> +     dbxread) figure out which object is the entry file is somewhat 
>> hokey.  */
>> +  if (inside_entry_file (frame_pc_unwind (fi)))
>> +      return 0;
>> +
>> +  /* If we want backtraces to stop at main, and we're inside main, then it
>> +     isn't valid.  */
>> +  if (!backtrace_below_main && inside_main_func (get_frame_pc (fi)))
>> +    return 0;
>> 
>> That more closely resembles the original behavior.
> 
> 
> I think that's pretty much ok.  Old targets in need of one of these functions
> can still call it from (deprecated_)frame_chain_valid().

Ok, sold.

Consider that approved.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-05 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-27 11:33 Corinna Vinschen
2003-03-29  0:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 15:31   ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-01 15:38     ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-01 15:39     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 16:18       ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-01 16:35         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 17:03           ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-01 17:30             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 19:58               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02  9:27                 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-02 16:36                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-02 16:42                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02 17:03                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-02 17:05                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02 18:20                           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-02 18:23                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02 20:11                               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-02 20:38                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-03 13:17                     ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-05 13:57                       ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-04-10 11:12                         ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-02 16:39                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E8EE0A6.4070403@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox