Re: [RFA] Remove calls to inside_entry_file

[Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 05:31:25PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:28:36PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > >Index: blockframe.c
> > >===================================================================
> > >RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/blockframe.c,v
> > 
> > For "blockframe.c", please leave it as is.  I'm already in enough 
> > trouble for breaking old targets so I'd prefer to leave that part 
> > untouched.  It would only affect out-of-date targets anyway.  The 
> > up-to-date targets don't rely on that function.
> 
> I've checked in the frame.c patch but still, I don't understand this
> decision.  So called out-of-date targets can easily add the
> inside_entry_file() call to their frame_chain_valid() implementation
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                      frame_chain()

> so removing this call from blockframe.c does not necessarily break
> them.  Keeping this call in blockframe.c on the other hand breaks
> some targets for which this call is plainly wrong.  So the logic would
> imply to remove the call in favour of *all* targets able to run correctly.
> 
> I've checked this patch (including the patch to i386_frame_chain_valid)
> on four targets, xstormy16-elf, i686-pc-cygwin, i686-pc-linux and arm-elf.
> The first two are running fine then, the latter two are totally
> unaffected.
> 
> 
> Corinna
> 
> P.S.: I'll submit the i386_frame_chain_valid patch separately.
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                          i386_frame_chain()

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.
mailto:vinschen@redhat.com