Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Re-initializing a list after the control returns to gdb...
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E53C88E.90807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030219175056.GP2105@gnat.com>

>> You've the `observer' problem.
> 
> 
> Just like when you are sick, you already feel better when you know which
> disease you have contracted :).
> 
> 
>> GDB's observer code is very primative.  A combination of gdb-events 
>> (needs direction) and chained hooks (see target_new_objfile_hook).
>> 
>> I suspect what you really want is a `target changed' event.
> 
> 
> I need to update the task list every time the inferior stops and
> the control returns to the user. I think the `target change' event
> is not exactly what I would need?

The code relies on global state so I think `target changed' is better - 
that way you know that your state is up-to-date.  From memory, right now 
we've actually memory_changed and registers_changed (I think they should 
be merged).  There is also a target run hook that insight uses.

> Do we have a list of currently supported events? Is there a framework
> for implementing these events?

That's the problem (you said sick), we've three:
- gdb-events
- chained hooks
- simple hooks
gdb-events started on the problem but lost direction.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-19 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-19  2:01 Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 12:47 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 16:05   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 16:49     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:46       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 17:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:50   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 18:05     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-02-19 19:24       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 20:30         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25  1:37           ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-26 15:57             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-27  7:13               ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-27 18:44                 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-28  7:42                   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E53C88E.90807@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox