Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Re-initializing a list after the control returns to gdb...
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030219192422.GS2105@gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E53C88E.90807@redhat.com>

> The code relies on global state so I think `target changed' is better - 
> that way you know that your state is up-to-date.  From memory, right now 
> we've actually memory_changed and registers_changed (I think they should 
> be merged).  There is also a target run hook that insight uses.

Unfortunately `target changed' does not trigger at least every time
I need it to. I looked at the code, and it should basically trigger
everytime we change some data in memory. 

A quick attempt with "set debug event 1" shows that the only events
I see in a simple "break; run" sequence are breakpoint events...

> That's the problem (you said sick), we've three:
> - gdb-events
> - chained hooks
> - simple hooks
> gdb-events started on the problem but lost direction.

I like the events mechanism, it's a paradigm that's used very widely.
But the gdb-event mechanism does not seem to allow several clients
subscribing for these events at the same time. This mechanism is
then very close to the simple hooks.

I am therefore thinking of implementing a new chained hook in place
of the direct call to ada_read_tasks_list. Would that be an acceptable
solution?

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-19 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-19  2:01 Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 12:47 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 16:05   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 16:49     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:46       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 17:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:50   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-19 18:05     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 19:24       ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2003-02-19 20:30         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25  1:37           ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-26 15:57             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-27  7:13               ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-27 18:44                 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-28  7:42                   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030219192422.GS2105@gnat.com \
    --to=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox