From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>,
GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Artifical dwarf2 debug info
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DFE14D9.7040102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021216172813.GA18150@nevyn.them.org>
> That's right.
>
>
>> If that is the case then I don't think this is either necessary or
>> correct. A `struct frame_info' allows frame specific unwind functions -
>> at present only dummy-frame and saved-regs-frame versions are
>> implemented, however the next ones to implement are cfi-frame (unwind
>> using CFI info) and regs-frame (unwind using the register cache).
>>
>> For your problem, wouldn't it be better to, instead of creating fake CFI
>> info, implement custom frame unwind functions that handle your case?
>
>
> Hrm. What do you mean by regs-frame? If it's for the current frame
> wouldn't that be a frame which just doesn't unwind?
A frame that gets the saved registers from the register cache. As for uses:
- an inner-most frame that for some reason doesn't unwind (i.e.,
create_new_frame() barfs).
- the frame that is inner to `current frame'.
> As for this situation, and the similar one for i386... there are three
> unwind functions, to find the previous frame's registers, ID, and PC.
> For this case we just want to express a normal function call which
> saves no registers; pretty easy. But for i386 I'll want to express
> something which initially pushes a register, and then does some work,
> pops it, and does more work before returning.
So you're proposing that the saved-regs code be used to generate a cfi
description as well?
Interesting.
Andrew
> There's plenty of ways to express that but it seems to me that the most
> useful one would be to have essentially a glorified prologue reader
> which builds that description. Then the machinery to handle that
> description is - you guessed it - a standard CFI reader. It might be
> nice to someday split up the CFI parser and executer so that we could
> provide the description less obtusely, but I'd hate to see us duplicate
> the machinery.
> BTW,
> /* See description above. The previous frame's resume address.
> Save the previous PC in a local cache. */
> frame_pc_unwind_ftype *pc_unwind;
>
> /* See description above. The previous frame's resume address.
> Save the previous PC in a local cache. */
> frame_id_unwind_ftype *id_unwind;
>
> Second comment is a past-o?
Thanks.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-16 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-14 17:31 Michal Ludvig
2002-12-14 22:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-12-15 11:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 7:28 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-12-16 7:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 9:27 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-12-16 9:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 10:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-12-20 8:43 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-12-20 10:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-12-16 9:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-16 9:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 10:04 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-12-16 10:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 10:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-16 11:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 11:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-16 11:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 12:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-16 12:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-17 6:23 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-12-17 6:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-17 8:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-18 4:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-18 10:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-02 20:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-02 21:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-02 23:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-02 23:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-03 0:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-16 9:46 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-12-16 9:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-16 10:01 ` Michal Ludvig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DFE14D9.7040102@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox