Re: sim/mips patch: add support for more NEC VR targets

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

> Not really.  8-)
> 
> First of all i'm not sure which question you were trying to answer,
> even (today's, i.e. "veto, anyone?" or a previous question).
> 
> Is your intent here to say that really, "the mips sim will/must be
> done the way you outline above," or is it to provide a rationale for
> why you think it should be done that way.  (to my mind, it could be
> either; you're a mips sim maintainer long before i got here.)

This is the way it has (ment to) been done for all MIPS ISA variants 
since igen replaced gencode.  You've proposed a change to that process 
so I'm [trying to] explain the rationale behind the current status-quo :-)

Andrew

> Based on what you've said above, I still don't agree that your
> suggested way of doing this is the right one.