From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa+5.3] bug in my earlier DW_TAG_namespace patch
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DE29434.2090205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1fztuh2kx.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 226 bytes --]
Hello,
David recommended this for:
####### #####
# # #
# #
###### #####
# ### #
# # ### # #
##### ### ####
any comments?
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: mailbox-message://ac131313@movemail/fsf/gdb/patches#10783294 --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4395 bytes --]
From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Subject: [rfa+5.3] bug in my earlier DW_TAG_namespace patch
Date: 21 Nov 2002 16:26:22 -0800
Message-ID: <ro1fztuh2kx.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
I just noticed that my earlier patch that allowed GDB to accept
DW_TAG_namespace entries had a bug in it. The function
scan_partial_symbols in dwarf2read.c only descends into DIEs that have
a name; but anonymous namespaces can lead to DIEs without names which
have interesting children (where by "interesting" I mean that we want
to add partial symbols corresponding to them). This could result in
us missing some partial symbols.
I've enclosed a patch below: for obvious reasons, it should go into
GDB 5.3 as well. I've run GDB on a copy of GDB with this patch
applied and followed the control flow when GDB runs into various sorts
of DW_TAG_namespace entries, and the control flow seems to behave like
I expect it to. (This is, admittedly, after only a limited amount of
testing.) I'm in the middle of running the testsuite (I'll run it
twice, once on a compiler that doesn't generate DW_TAG_namespace
entries and once on a compiler that does); assuming that there are no
new regressions, is the patch okay?
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu
2002-11-21 David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
* dwarf2read.c (scan_partial_symbols): Descend into namespace
pdi's with no name.
Index: dwarf2read.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -p -r1.75 dwarf2read.c
--- dwarf2read.c 11 Nov 2002 00:55:34 -0000 1.75
+++ dwarf2read.c 22 Nov 2002 00:11:49 -0000
@@ -1359,7 +1359,9 @@ scan_partial_symbols (char *info_ptr, st
{
info_ptr = read_partial_die (&pdi, abfd, info_ptr, cu_header);
- if (pdi.name)
+ /* Anonymous namespaces have no name but are interesting. */
+
+ if (pdi.name != NULL || pdi.tag == DW_TAG_namespace)
{
switch (pdi.tag)
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-25 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-21 16:26 David Carlton
2002-11-25 13:20 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-11-25 13:37 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-11-25 13:43 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DE29434.2090205@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox