From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>,
David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa+5.3] bug in my earlier DW_TAG_namespace patch
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15842.38677.146754.12091@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DE29434.2090205@redhat.com>
Andrew Cagney writes:
> Hello,
>
> David recommended this for:
>
> ####### #####
> # # #
> # #
> ###### #####
> # ### #
> # # ### # #
> ##### ### ####
>
> any comments?
>
I knew I was forgetting something.
> I just noticed that my earlier patch that allowed GDB to accept
> DW_TAG_namespace entries had a bug in it. The function
> scan_partial_symbols in dwarf2read.c only descends into DIEs that have
> a name; but anonymous namespaces can lead to DIEs without names which
> have interesting children (where by "interesting" I mean that we want
> to add partial symbols corresponding to them). This could result in
> us missing some partial symbols.
>
> I've enclosed a patch below: for obvious reasons, it should go into
> GDB 5.3 as well. I've run GDB on a copy of GDB with this patch
> applied and followed the control flow when GDB runs into various sorts
> of DW_TAG_namespace entries, and the control flow seems to behave like
> I expect it to. (This is, admittedly, after only a limited amount of
> testing.) I'm in the middle of running the testsuite (I'll run it
> twice, once on a compiler that doesn't generate DW_TAG_namespace
> entries and once on a compiler that does); assuming that there are no
> new regressions, is the patch okay?
Were there regressions?
If not, go ahead.
Elena
>
> David Carlton
> carlton@math.stanford.edu
>
> 2002-11-21 David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
>
> * dwarf2read.c (scan_partial_symbols): Descend into namespace
> pdi's with no name.
>
> Index: dwarf2read.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.75
> diff -u -p -r1.75 dwarf2read.c
> --- dwarf2read.c 11 Nov 2002 00:55:34 -0000 1.75
> +++ dwarf2read.c 22 Nov 2002 00:11:49 -0000
> @@ -1359,7 +1359,9 @@ scan_partial_symbols (char *info_ptr, st
> {
> info_ptr = read_partial_die (&pdi, abfd, info_ptr, cu_header);
>
> - if (pdi.name)
> + /* Anonymous namespaces have no name but are interesting. */
> +
> + if (pdi.name != NULL || pdi.tag == DW_TAG_namespace)
> {
> switch (pdi.tag)
> {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-25 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-21 16:26 David Carlton
2002-11-25 13:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-25 13:37 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2002-11-25 13:43 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15842.38677.146754.12091@localhost.redhat.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox