Re: Patch: drop NEC v810 support

[Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>]

Jim Wilson wrote:
> It was a newlib only port, using the NEC compiler.  It was a rather unusual
> port, and one that we don't need to worry about now.  Dropping the mt-v810
> file is OK.
So if I submitted a patch which just did this, it could get approved easily?

	* configure.in (v810*): Remove special setting of tools.

--- configure.in	2002-11-10 18:58:13.000000000 -0500
+++ configure.in.new	2002-11-10 18:57:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -1111,9 +1108,6 @@
  extra_arflags_for_target=
  extra_nmflags_for_target=
  case "${target}" in
-  v810*)
-    target_makefile_frag="config/mt-v810"
-    ;;
    i[3456]86-*-netware*)
      target_makefile_frag="config/mt-netware"
      ;;

> Dropping the port is OK too, but if we are doing that, then we may as well
> delete the newlib bits.  The main part is in the lib/sys/sysnec810 directory
> and the newlib configure.host file, but there are various files with 
> #ifdef __v810__ in them to deal with NEC compiler specific issues.  Use
> "find . -type f | xargs grep v810" to find them.  This isn't your problem
> though, it is a problem for the newlib maintainers to worry about.
> 
> Jim

I just want to get through the autoconfiscation blockers.

--Nathanael