From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 9503 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2002 21:01:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout5-0.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.122) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2002 21:01:05 -0000 Received: from twcny.rr.com (syr-66-66-30-119.twcny.rr.com [66.66.30.119]) by mailout5-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/RoadRunner 1.20) with ESMTP id gABL10F03803; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:01:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DD01A87.8070200@twcny.rr.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:15:00 -0000 From: Nathanael Nerode User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021108 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Wilson CC: newlib@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@sources.redhat.com, dj@redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch: drop NEC v810 support References: <20021111000953.GA526@doctormoo> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 Jim Wilson wrote: > It was a newlib only port, using the NEC compiler. It was a rather unusual > port, and one that we don't need to worry about now. Dropping the mt-v810 > file is OK. So if I submitted a patch which just did this, it could get approved easily? * configure.in (v810*): Remove special setting of tools. --- configure.in 2002-11-10 18:58:13.000000000 -0500 +++ configure.in.new 2002-11-10 18:57:40.000000000 -0500 @@ -1111,9 +1108,6 @@ extra_arflags_for_target= extra_nmflags_for_target= case "${target}" in - v810*) - target_makefile_frag="config/mt-v810" - ;; i[3456]86-*-netware*) target_makefile_frag="config/mt-netware" ;; > Dropping the port is OK too, but if we are doing that, then we may as well > delete the newlib bits. The main part is in the lib/sys/sysnec810 directory > and the newlib configure.host file, but there are various files with > #ifdef __v810__ in them to deal with NEC compiler specific issues. Use > "find . -type f | xargs grep v810" to find them. This isn't your problem > though, it is a problem for the newlib maintainers to worry about. > > Jim I just want to get through the autoconfiscation blockers. --Nathanael