Re: [RFA] arm_store_return_value, big-endian

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>]

Michael Snyder wrote:
> 
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> > > This corresponds to the earlier patch for arm_extract_return_value.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2002-11-06  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@redhat.com>
> > >
> > >       * arm-tdep.c (arm_store_return_value): Handle offset of
> > >       small types on big-endian machines.
> > >
> > > Index: arm-tdep.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/arm-tdep.c,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.74
> > > diff -p -r1.74 arm-tdep.c
> > > *** arm-tdep.c        1 Nov 2002 21:21:49 -0000       1.74
> > > --- arm-tdep.c        6 Nov 2002 23:47:34 -0000
> > > *************** gdb_print_insn_arm (bfd_vma memaddr, dis
> > > *** 2151,2156 ****
> > > --- 2151,2159 ----
> > >         memaddr = UNMAKE_THUMB_ADDR (memaddr);
> > >         info->symbols = &asym;
> > >       }
> > > +   else if (TYPE_LENGTH (type) < REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (A1_REGNUM))
> > > +     write_register_bytes (REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (A1_REGNUM) - TYPE_LENGTH (type),
> > > +                       valbuf, TYPE_LENGTH (type));
> > >     else
> > >       info->symbols = NULL;
> > >
> >
> > Write register bytes is dead.
> 
> I'm not having this argument with you again, Andrew.
> If you want the fix, take it.  If not, don't.

Hang on -- that diff is entirely wrong.  My use of write_register_bytes
was supposed to be replacing an existing use of write_register_bytes.
Let me see what went wrong...