Re: [PATCH RFC] Character set support

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>]

>> The accepted GDB convention is per the above.
> 
> 
> I did not realize that this was the accepted convention.  Was there some
> communication on this matter that I missed?  If it is the accepted
> convention, then I think it ought to be reconsidered.

If there was, it was before my time :-)  The convention is used 
throughout the ChangeLogs going back to nearly the dawn of time.  I did 
manage to find one ``Committed''' style message mind you, but 
``From...''s win by a clear margin :-)

Anyway, in this particular case I have no real reason to care.  However, 
if this change had involved someone who, for what ever reason, no longer 
had an applicable assignment, then I would care a great deal.

BTW, you may want to fix your shell script :-)  At present you're 
missing out on a few credits of your own ;-)

Fri Jul 29 13:46:08 1994  Fred Fish  (fnf@cygnus.com)

         From Kevin A. Buettner (kev@cujo.geg.mot.com).
         * Makefile.in (coredep.o):  Add inferior.h as dependency.
         * inflow.c:  Add F_SETOWN to list of defines to check
         around code that uses F_SETOWN.

enjoy,
Andrew