[RFA] __restrict_arr

[RFA] __restrict_arr

[Michal Ludvig]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 329 bytes --]

Hi all,
in GCC 3.1 the symbol __restrict_arr is already defined and doesn't need 
to be redegined in include/xregex2.h. So I wrapped it into a condition. 
It prevents compiler from complaining. Any objections or can I commit it?

Michal Ludvig
-- 
* SuSE CR, s.r.o     * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373   * http://www.suse.cz

[-- Attachment #2: rarr-1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 777 bytes --]

2002-07-17  Michal Ludvig  <mludvig@suse.cz>

	* include/xregex2.h: Wrap __restrict_arr between #ifndef/#endif.

Index: include/xregex2.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/xregex2.h,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 xregex2.h
--- include/xregex2.h	19 Jul 2001 00:04:11 -0000	1.2
+++ include/xregex2.h	18 Jul 2002 11:31:36 -0000
@@ -532,7 +532,9 @@ extern int re_exec _RE_ARGS ((const char
 /* For now unconditionally define __restrict_arr to expand to nothing.
    Ideally we would have a test for the compiler which allows defining
    it to restrict.  */
+#ifndef __restrict_arr
 #define __restrict_arr
+#endif
 
 /* POSIX compatibility.  */
 extern int regcomp _RE_ARGS ((regex_t *__restrict __preg,

Re: [RFA] __restrict_arr

[Andrew Cagney]

> 2002-07-17  Michal Ludvig  <mludvig@suse.cz>
> 
> 	* include/xregex2.h: Wrap __restrict_arr between #ifndef/#endif.
> 

Just FYI, this should go to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org for approval.

Andrew