Re: Resend: [RFA] Fix problem with i386 watchpoints after restarting

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>]

> At 18:25 04/07/2002 , Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit:
> 
>>On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> 
>> > At 15:35 17/06/2002 , Pierre Muller a écrit:
> 
>> > >At 12:16 13/06/2002 , Mark Kettenis a écrit:
> 
>> > > >Sorry, I somehow missed your earlier message.  This seems to me as an
>> > > >acceptable way to solve the problem (although I still think there is
>> > > >something wrong with GDB's mechanism of removing hardware breakpoints.
>> > > >But: could you add the reason why this is needed to the comment.
>> > > >Minor nit: Please end your sentences with a '.' and put two spaces
>> > > >after it.
> 
>> > >OK, I slightly modifed the patch
>> > >by adding a comment to i386-nat.c 
>> > >and correcting the comment in the nm-i386.h file.
>> > >
>> > >Can I check this in?
> 
>> > 
>> > After getting approval by a private mail, I have
>> > checked this in.
> 
>>
>>Is this appropriate for the branch also?  My instincts say yes.
> 
> Isn't 5.2.1 aleady frozen?

No.  I keep going to do this but someone turns up with a new patch :-)

> I would also be in favor of putting it into the branch, but I don't know who should decide this....

Something for the i386 maintainers to decide.

Andrew