Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>,
	Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Don't gdbarch_init for core files
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 16:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CE43C83.BC71967A@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020512034536.GA25145@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 08:30:35PM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:48:13PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >  > is [almost] no different to deleting the call - GDB isn't yet built with
> >  > multiple architectures so the two architectures will always be identical.
> >  >
> >  > Looking at the date/author of the original patch [and making a wild
> >  > guess], I think the original change was related to debugging 32 bit core
> >  > files on a SPARC64 system.  Michael?
> >
> > Well, I know Solaris dumps a 32-bit core file for a 32-bit binary,
> > and a 64-bit core file for a 64-bit binary.
> >
> > I simply fail to see any reason why you'd want to re-initialize the
> > gdbarch for a core file.
> >
> > I guess I really do need to know why the change was added in the first
> > place (the message with the original patch doesn't describe the problem
> > the patch is trying to solve).
> 
> Just a guess - debugging a core file without an original binary?

Bingo!   ;-)


  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-16 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-09 18:58 Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-09 20:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 21:21   ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-11 19:48     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11 20:30       ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-11 20:46         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-16 16:24           ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2002-05-16 16:24       ` Michael Snyder
2002-05-16 17:33         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-17  6:58 m.m.kettenis
2002-05-17 10:47 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-17 10:59   ` Michael Snyder
2002-05-17 16:06     ` Mark Kettenis
2002-05-17 10:54 ` Michael Snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CE43C83.BC71967A@redhat.com \
    --to=msnyder@redhat.com \
    --cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=thorpej@wasabisystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox