Re: [rfc/cli:rfa] Don't copy func() into show from set ..

[Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>]

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > Andrew, I agree with all that you say before but I have some
> > additional thoughts.
> 
> I'll leave it for a week then commit it (if that is ok) .....
> 

Sure.

> > Should we ever allow for the creation of a set command without
> > a show?  If not, we should get rid of add_set_cmd() and
> > add_show_from_set() and have a single add_setshow_cmd().
> > This would prevent anyone of creating a set without the
> > corresponding show and hide the implementation details.
> 
> That's true.
> 
> > It could return the show pointer as an argument if so requested.
> 
> Ah, yes!  You're thinking of
> 
>         set = add_setshow_cmd (name, class, ..., &show);
> 
> where the &show could be NULL.
> 
> I can add it, and ARI (just info) the other versions, if you want.
> 

If you can, please do it.

Thank you very much for the fix and clean-up.

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9