* expect won't build with Tru64 cc
@ 2002-03-06 16:00 Alexandre Oliva
2002-03-06 17:41 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2002-03-06 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Don Libes
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 523 bytes --]
Using the following C compiler on alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f
% cc -V | head -1
DEC C V5.9-010 on Digital UNIX V4.0 (Rev. 1229)
GDB won't build (both CVS and mainline). One of the reasons is that
expect contains an ill-formed C construct that the DEC C compiler
rejects (actually, it warns about it, but the #define fails to take
effect). This patch fixes the problem. I don't know whether this is
already fixed in expect upstream, so I'm Cc:ing Don Libes.
GDB/expect maintainers, ok to install in mainline and 5.2 branch?
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: expect-alpha-cc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 929 bytes --]
Index: expect/ChangeLog
from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* exp_command.c (STARARGV): Indent #defines properly.
Index: expect/exp_command.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/expect/exp_command.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 exp_command.c
--- expect/exp_command.c 2001/09/11 19:24:03 1.3
+++ expect/exp_command.c 2002/03/06 23:52:38
@@ -2648,13 +2648,13 @@ Tcl_Obj *CONST argv[]; /* Argument objec
argc--; argv++;
#if TCL_MAJOR_VERSION < 8
- #define STARARGV *argv
+# define STARARGV *argv
#else
- #if TCL_MINOR_VERSION < 3
- #define STARARGV Tcl_GetStringFromObj(*argv,(int *)0)
- #else
- #define STARARGV Tcl_GetString(*argv)
- #endif
+# if TCL_MINOR_VERSION < 3
+# define STARARGV Tcl_GetStringFromObj(*argv,(int *)0)
+# else
+# define STARARGV Tcl_GetString(*argv)
+# endif
#endif
for (;argc>0;argc--,argv++) {
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 289 bytes --]
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: expect won't build with Tru64 cc
2002-03-06 16:00 expect won't build with Tru64 cc Alexandre Oliva
@ 2002-03-06 17:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-06 18:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-03-06 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Oliva; +Cc: gdb-patches, Don Libes
> Using the following C compiler on alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f
>
> % cc -V | head -1
> DEC C V5.9-010 on Digital UNIX V4.0 (Rev. 1229)
>
> GDB won't build (both CVS and mainline). One of the reasons is that
> expect contains an ill-formed C construct that the DEC C compiler
> rejects (actually, it warns about it, but the #define fails to take
> effect). This patch fixes the problem. I don't know whether this is
> already fixed in expect upstream, so I'm Cc:ing Don Libes.
>
> GDB/expect maintainers, ok to install in mainline and 5.2 branch?
Just so I'm sure I'm not seeing anything, the problem is that the ``#''
isn't at the start of the line?
If that is the case then yes, fine. If it really is the case then I
think I'm going to have to add this to the coding standard/ARI for GDB,
it is just too wierd. (I've a fuzzy memory of seeing this before).
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: expect won't build with Tru64 cc
2002-03-06 17:41 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-03-06 18:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2002-03-06 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches, Don Libes
On Mar 6, 2002, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> wrote:
>> Using the following C compiler on alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f
>> % cc -V | head -1
>> DEC C V5.9-010 on Digital UNIX V4.0 (Rev. 1229)
>> GDB won't build (both CVS and mainline). One of the reasons is that
>> expect contains an ill-formed C construct that the DEC C compiler
>> rejects (actually, it warns about it, but the #define fails to take
>> effect). This patch fixes the problem. I don't know whether this is
>> already fixed in expect upstream, so I'm Cc:ing Don Libes.
>> GDB/expect maintainers, ok to install in mainline and 5.2 branch?
> Just so I'm sure I'm not seeing anything, the problem is that the
> ``#'' isn't at the start of the line?
Yup.
> If that is the case then yes, fine. If it really is the case then I
> think I'm going to have to add this to the coding standard/ARI for
> GDB, it is just too wierd. (I've a fuzzy memory of seeing this before).
GCC warns about it when given some flags. I'm not sure ISO C already
supports preprocessor directives with the `#' preceded by whitespace,
but I'm pretty sure a number of K&R compilers don't.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-07 2:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-06 16:00 expect won't build with Tru64 cc Alexandre Oliva
2002-03-06 17:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-06 18:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox