Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch] Delete linux-thread.c
@ 2002-02-23 19:35 Andrew Cagney
  2002-02-23 19:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-23 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 68 bytes --]

(not to be confused with lin-thread.c)
The file isn't used.

Andrew

[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 779 bytes --]

2002-02-23  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>

	* Makefile.in (linux-thread.o): Delete target.
	* linux-thread.c: Delete file.

Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.161
diff -u -r1.161 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in	2002/02/23 20:36:49	1.161
+++ Makefile.in	2002/02/24 03:33:47
@@ -1852,9 +1852,6 @@
 
 linux-proc.o: linux-proc.c $(defs_h)
 
-linux-thread.o: linux-thread.c $(breakpoint_h) $(gdbcmd_h) gdb_wait.h \
-	$(gdbthread_h) $(gdbcore_h) $(inferior_h) $(target_h) $(defs_h)
-
 thread-db.o: thread-db.c $(defs_h) gdb_assert.h gdb_proc_service.h \
 	gdb_thread_db.h $(bfd_h) $(gdbthread_h) $(inferior_h) $(symfile_h) \
 	$(objfiles_h) $(target_h) $(regcache_h)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] Delete linux-thread.c
  2002-02-23 19:35 [patch] Delete linux-thread.c Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-23 19:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2002-02-23 20:05   ` Andrew Cagney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-02-23 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:34:55PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> (not to be confused with lin-thread.c)
> The file isn't used.
> 
> Andrew

What about lin-thread.c?  Is that on the hitlist too - I'm fairly sure
it isn't used.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] Delete linux-thread.c
  2002-02-23 19:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-02-23 20:05   ` Andrew Cagney
  2002-02-23 20:11     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2002-02-23 22:21     ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-23 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches

> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:34:55PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> (not to be confused with lin-thread.c)
>> The file isn't used.
>> 
>> Andrew
> 
> 
> What about lin-thread.c?  Is that on the hitlist too - I'm fairly sure
> it isn't used.

Can do.  I'm wondering how it became an outling - I thought lin-thread.c 
replaced linux-thread.c.

Andrew




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] Delete linux-thread.c
  2002-02-23 20:05   ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-23 20:11     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2002-02-23 20:30       ` [patch] Delete lin-thread.c; Was: " Andrew Cagney
  2002-02-23 22:21     ` Michael Snyder
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-02-23 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:04:56PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:34:55PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>(not to be confused with lin-thread.c)
> >>The file isn't used.
> >>
> >>Andrew
> >
> >
> >What about lin-thread.c?  Is that on the hitlist too - I'm fairly sure
> >it isn't used.
> 
> Can do.  I'm wondering how it became an outling - I thought lin-thread.c 
> replaced linux-thread.c.

It did - but very briefly, I think.  Lin-lwp is the current module. 
lin-thread.c appeared in Dec. 1999, and lin-lwp in Sep. 2000; we've
been transitioning to the latter and completed it a few months ago.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [patch] Delete lin-thread.c; Was: [patch] Delete linux-thread.c
  2002-02-23 20:11     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-02-23 20:30       ` Andrew Cagney
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-23 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 331 bytes --]

> Can do.  I'm wondering how it became an outling - I thought lin-thread.c 
>> replaced linux-thread.c.
> 
> 
> It did - but very briefly, I think.  Lin-lwp is the current module. 
> lin-thread.c appeared in Dec. 1999, and lin-lwp in Sep. 2000; we've
> been transitioning to the latter and completed it a few months ago.

Gone!




[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 878 bytes --]

2002-02-23  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>

	* lin-thread.c: Delete file.
	* configure.in (gdb_cv_struct_reg_r_gs): Update comment to refer
	to gdb_proc_service.h.
	* configure: Re-generate.

Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -r1.81 configure.in
--- configure.in	2002/02/23 21:54:25	1.81
+++ configure.in	2002/02/24 04:28:22
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
   dnl For Linux/i386, glibc 2.1.3 was released with a bogus
   dnl prfpregset_t type (it's a typedef for the pointer to a struct
   dnl instead of the struct itself).  We detect this here, and work
-  dnl around it in lin-thread.c.
+  dnl around it in gdb_proc_service.h.
 
   if test $bfd_cv_have_sys_procfs_type_prfpregset_t = yes; then
     AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether prfpregset_t type is broken)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] Delete linux-thread.c
  2002-02-23 20:05   ` Andrew Cagney
  2002-02-23 20:11     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-02-23 22:21     ` Michael Snyder
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-02-23 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz, gdb-patches

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:34:55PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >> (not to be confused with lin-thread.c)
> >> The file isn't used.
> >>
> >> Andrew
> >
> >
> > What about lin-thread.c?  Is that on the hitlist too - I'm fairly sure
> > it isn't used.
> 
> Can do.  I'm wondering how it became an outling - I thought lin-thread.c
> replaced linux-thread.c.

That's right, but then Daniel re-wrote it and 
replaced it with thread-db.c.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-24  6:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-23 19:35 [patch] Delete linux-thread.c Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 19:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-23 20:05   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 20:11     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-23 20:30       ` [patch] Delete lin-thread.c; Was: " Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 22:21     ` Michael Snyder

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox