* [Fwd: [rfa] Call methods with proper promotion]
@ 2002-01-13 20:41 Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 20:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-01-13 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches, Daniel Jacobowitz
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 39 bytes --]
Daniel, did this get resolved?
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: [rfa] Call methods with proper promotion --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 5767 bytes --]
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [rfa] Call methods with proper promotion
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:53:01 -0500
Message-ID: <20011203225301.A14016@nevyn.them.org>
[Did this ever work at all? I doubt!]
TYPE_NFIELDS () is 0 for methods. The arguments were thus treated by
hand_function_call only according to default promotions. Things like
call-by-reference never happened.
This fixes:
-FAIL: gdb.c++/classes.exp: base class (¶m)->a
-FAIL: gdb.c++/classes.exp: base class (¶m)->x
-FAIL: gdb.c++/classes.exp: inherited class (¶m)->a
-FAIL: gdb.c++/classes.exp: inherited class (¶m)->x
+PASS: gdb.c++/classes.exp: base class (¶m)->a
+PASS: gdb.c++/classes.exp: base class (¶m)->x
+PASS: gdb.c++/classes.exp: inherited class (¶m)->a
+PASS: gdb.c++/classes.exp: inherited class (¶m)->x
No regressions, brings me ever closer on my march towards zero testsuite
failures! OK to commit?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
2001-12-03 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* valops.c (hand_function_call): Check for method arguments in
TYPE_ARG_TYPES(), not in TYPE_FIELD ().
Index: valops.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/valops.c,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -p -r1.41 valops.c
--- valops.c 2001/11/13 16:44:13 1.41
+++ valops.c 2001/12/04 03:45:19
@@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ hand_function_call (value_ptr function,
CORE_ADDR real_pc;
struct type *param_type = NULL;
struct type *ftype = check_typedef (SYMBOL_TYPE (function));
+ int n_method_args = 0;
dummy = alloca (SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS);
sizeof_dummy1 = REGISTER_SIZE * SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS / sizeof (ULONGEST);
@@ -1424,11 +1425,31 @@ hand_function_call (value_ptr function,
sp = old_sp; /* It really is used, for some ifdef's... */
#endif
- if (nargs < TYPE_NFIELDS (ftype))
+ if (TYPE_CODE (ftype) == TYPE_CODE_METHOD)
+ {
+ i = 0;
+ while (TYPE_CODE (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (ftype)[i]) != TYPE_CODE_VOID)
+ i++;
+ n_method_args = i;
+ if (nargs < i)
+ error ("too few arguments in method call");
+ }
+ else if (nargs < TYPE_NFIELDS (ftype))
error ("too few arguments in function call");
for (i = nargs - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
+ /* Assume that methods are always prototyped, unless they are off the
+ end (which we should only be allowing if there is a ``...'').
+ FIXME. */
+ if (TYPE_CODE (ftype) == TYPE_CODE_METHOD)
+ {
+ if (i < n_method_args)
+ args[i] = value_arg_coerce (args[i], TYPE_ARG_TYPES (ftype)[i], 1);
+ else
+ args[i] = value_arg_coerce (args[i], NULL, 0);
+ }
+
/* If we're off the end of the known arguments, do the standard
promotions. FIXME: if we had a prototype, this should only
be allowed if ... were present. */
@@ -2618,12 +2639,13 @@ value_find_oload_method_list (value_ptr
int
find_overload_match (struct type **arg_types, int nargs, char *name, int method,
- int lax, value_ptr obj, struct symbol *fsym,
+ int lax, value_ptr *objp, struct symbol *fsym,
value_ptr *valp, struct symbol **symp, int *staticp)
{
int nparms;
struct type **parm_types;
int champ_nparms = 0;
+ struct value *obj = (objp ? *objp : NULL);
short oload_champ = -1; /* Index of best overloaded function */
short oload_ambiguous = 0; /* Current ambiguity state for overload resolution */
@@ -2847,6 +2869,15 @@ find_overload_match (struct type **arg_t
xfree (func_name);
}
+ if (objp)
+ {
+ if (TYPE_CODE (VALUE_TYPE (temp)) != TYPE_CODE_PTR
+ && TYPE_CODE (VALUE_TYPE (*objp)) == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
+ {
+ temp = value_addr (temp);
+ }
+ *objp = temp;
+ }
return oload_incompatible ? 100 : (oload_non_standard ? 10 : 0);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: [rfa] Call methods with proper promotion]
2002-01-13 20:41 [Fwd: [rfa] Call methods with proper promotion] Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-01-13 20:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-01-13 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:41:15PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Daniel, did this get resolved?
>
> Andrew
Yes:
2001-12-07 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* valops.c (hand_function_call): Check for method arguments in
TYPE_ARG_TYPES(), not in TYPE_FIELD ().
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-14 4:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-13 20:41 [Fwd: [rfa] Call methods with proper promotion] Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 20:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox