* 5.1 -> 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs
2001-11-26 22:48 5.1 -> 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs Andrew Cagney
@ 2001-11-14 7:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-14 11:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-11-14 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 125 bytes --]
FYI,
I've bumped the 5.1 branch version.in again. This will (hopefully) kick
start the branches snapshot process.
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 438 bytes --]
2001-11-27 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* version.in: Bump version to 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs.
Index: version.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/version.in,v
retrieving revision 1.52.2.50
diff -p -r1.52.2.50 version.in
*** version.in 2001/11/22 05:48:28 1.52.2.50
--- version.in 2001/11/27 06:35:42
***************
*** 1 ****
! 5.1
--- 1 ----
! 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.1 -> 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs
2001-11-26 22:48 5.1 -> 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs Andrew Cagney
2001-11-14 7:44 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2001-11-14 11:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2001-11-14 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> I've bumped the 5.1 branch version.in again. This will (hopefully) kick
> start the branches snapshot process.
Are we going to release v5.1.1?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* 5.1 -> 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs
@ 2001-11-26 22:48 Andrew Cagney
2001-11-14 7:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-14 11:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-11-26 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
FYI,
I've bumped the 5.1 branch version.in again. This will (hopefully) kick
start the branches snapshot process.
Andrew
From mec@shout.net Mon Nov 26 22:53:00 2001
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: msnyder@cygnus.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Add ix86 target to asm-source.exp test
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:53:00 -0000
Message-id: <200111270653.AAA24001@duracef.shout.net>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00486.html
Content-length: 304
So the test was actually doing its job and pointing to a bug in gdb.
Nice!
I updated symtab.c to the current version, 1.49, where the incorrect
change has been reverted. The results are a perfect 10 PASS, 0 FAIL
with both binutils-2.11.2 and binutils-HEAD. More nice!
I'm a happy tester,
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-27 7:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-26 22:48 5.1 -> 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs Andrew Cagney
2001-11-14 7:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-14 11:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox