Re: [RFA] Wrappers again.

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

> Hi,
> 
> Resubmitting this for (dis?)aprroval.
> 
> Keith
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Keith Seitz <keiths@makita.cygnus.com>
> To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFA] More wrappers in varobj
> 
> Sorry for the delay. I got a little caught up in debugging some
> other stuff...
> 
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> 
>> have a look at breakpoint.c:gdb_breakpoint for a more robust / current
>> way of implementing these wrappers.
> 
> 
> Is this better?

Yes, much better - no casts.  Thanks for the effort.

> Slightly off-topic: We are going to be calling externally visible
> functions something like "gdb_FOO", right? Example: gdb_breakpoint and
> gdb_breakpoint_query. How are we going to name internal functions? Leading
> "_" or something?
> 
> I ask because I don't really want to have this patch introduce
> internal variations of gdb functions into the "libgdb" namespace.

Good question, I don't know.  A leading ``_'' isn't valid though.

Andrew