From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Wrappers again. Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 18:10:00 -0000 Message-id: <3BDF5D43.6050809@cygnus.com> References: X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00380.html > Hi, > > Resubmitting this for (dis?)aprroval. > > Keith > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:41:43 -0700 (PDT) > From: Keith Seitz > To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > Subject: Re: [RFA] More wrappers in varobj > > Sorry for the delay. I got a little caught up in debugging some > other stuff... > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> have a look at breakpoint.c:gdb_breakpoint for a more robust / current >> way of implementing these wrappers. > > > Is this better? Yes, much better - no casts. Thanks for the effort. > Slightly off-topic: We are going to be calling externally visible > functions something like "gdb_FOO", right? Example: gdb_breakpoint and > gdb_breakpoint_query. How are we going to name internal functions? Leading > "_" or something? > > I ask because I don't really want to have this patch introduce > internal variations of gdb functions into the "libgdb" namespace. Good question, I don't know. A leading ``_'' isn't valid though. Andrew