From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com, Jim blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>,
Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>
Subject: Re: Fix stack backtraces on 26-bit ARM
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BD73EF2.4050209@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200110221104.MAA06894@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
>> Hmm, I have the bones of a completely clean NetBSD/arm port. It isn't
>> complete, but it was written without reference to the existing NetBSD code.
>>
>
>
> Ok, attached is most of the code. There's one more patch, which I'll send
> separately, that allows ARM targets to be single-stepped when there is no
> kernel/hw support for single stepping.
>
> R.
>
> <date> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
>
> * config/arm/nbsd.mh config/arm/nbsd.mt config/arm/tm-nbsd.h
> config/arm/nm-nbsd.h config/arm/xm-nbsd.h: New files.
> * armbsd-nat.c: New file.
> * Makefile.in: Build it.
> * configure.host configure.tgt: Support NetBSD/arm.
(There has been some out of band assignment e-mail which has left me
pretty confused :-)
Lets see.
RichardE, the above was developed while you were at ARM and is hence
covered, solely, by an ARM assignment? [yes | no]
If this is true, can I suggest to the Arm maintainers that this be
considered. Then BenH can apply fixes to it (always easier and less
likely to have assignment problems) then new code. (I understand, third
hand this is kind of BenH's plan already).
I think this is preferable as it gives GDB's NetBSD/ARM support a clear
and auditable paper trail.
enjoy,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-24 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.SOL.4.33.0110201735080.16292-100000@virgo.cus.cam.ac.uk>
2001-10-20 11:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-21 6:22 ` Ben Harris
2001-10-21 9:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-22 3:20 ` Richard Earnshaw
2001-10-22 4:04 ` Richard Earnshaw
2001-10-22 4:18 ` [patch]: Software single-stepping on ARMs Richard Earnshaw
2001-12-17 8:40 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-12-17 9:04 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-10-24 15:22 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-10-25 12:51 ` Fix stack backtraces on 26-bit ARM Ben Harris
2001-12-17 8:34 ` Fernando Nasser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BD73EF2.4050209@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=bjh21@netbsd.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=jimb@cygnus.com \
--cc=tv@wasabisystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox