From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: Ben Harris , gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com, Jim blandy , Todd Vierling Subject: Re: Fix stack backtraces on 26-bit ARM Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:22:00 -0000 Message-id: <3BD73EF2.4050209@cygnus.com> References: <200110221104.MAA06894@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00317.html >> Hmm, I have the bones of a completely clean NetBSD/arm port. It isn't >> complete, but it was written without reference to the existing NetBSD code. >> > > > Ok, attached is most of the code. There's one more patch, which I'll send > separately, that allows ARM targets to be single-stepped when there is no > kernel/hw support for single stepping. > > R. > > Richard Earnshaw > > * config/arm/nbsd.mh config/arm/nbsd.mt config/arm/tm-nbsd.h > config/arm/nm-nbsd.h config/arm/xm-nbsd.h: New files. > * armbsd-nat.c: New file. > * Makefile.in: Build it. > * configure.host configure.tgt: Support NetBSD/arm. (There has been some out of band assignment e-mail which has left me pretty confused :-) Lets see. RichardE, the above was developed while you were at ARM and is hence covered, solely, by an ARM assignment? [yes | no] If this is true, can I suggest to the Arm maintainers that this be considered. Then BenH can apply fixes to it (always easier and less likely to have assignment problems) then new code. (I understand, third hand this is kind of BenH's plan already). I think this is preferable as it gives GDB's NetBSD/ARM support a clear and auditable paper trail. enjoy, Andrew