From: Jackie Smith Cashion <jsmith@redhat.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFA: "show user" output
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 11:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B990AFF.2B2AD149@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B98D43B.777559DD@redhat.com>
The output looks okay when I run the modified GDB. I must admit it's not
clear to me which ui_out function to use for which purpose. Here's how I
made my decisions:
while: I removed the call to ui_out_text since it does not output the
rest of the "while" command line.
while end: It is important to output the indenting spaces before the
keyword, so I removed the call to ui_out_field_string that came before
the ui_out_spaces.
if: I removed the call to ui_out_text since it does not output the rest
of the "if" command line.
else: Since ui_out_text had been used above to output "end" which like
"else" has no command line arguments, I kept the call to ui_out_text
here.
if end: I removed the call to ui_out_field_string that came before the
ui_out_spaces.
I guess the question is whether ui_out_text or ui_out_field_string
should be used to print a simple string with no additional arguments. Is
there a general rule?
Jackie
Fernando Nasser wrote:
>
> Have you checked the MI output before and after your patch?
>
> In particular, this bit suggests that in this last chunk you've removed
> the
> "good" else/end and left the "bad" ones ;-)
>
> > *************** print_command_lines (struct ui_out *uiou
> > *** 197,208 ****
> > {
> > if (depth)
> > ui_out_spaces (uiout, 2 * depth);
> > - ui_out_field_string (uiout, NULL, "else");
> > ui_out_text (uiout, "else\n");
> > print_command_lines (uiout, list->body_list[1], depth + 1);
> > }
> >
> > - ui_out_field_string (uiout, NULL, "end");
> > if (depth)
> > ui_out_spaces (uiout, 2 * depth);
> > ui_out_text (uiout, "end\n");
> > --- 194,203 ----
>
> Regards,
> Fernando
>
> --
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
--
Jackie Smith Cashion
email: jsmith@redhat.com
phone: 931 438 2432
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-07 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-06 14:58 Jackie Smith Cashion
2001-09-07 7:09 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-07 11:04 ` Jackie Smith Cashion [this message]
2001-09-08 11:18 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-08 19:13 ` Jackie Smith Cashion
2001-09-09 8:15 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-09 10:20 ` Jackie Smith Cashion
2001-09-10 8:33 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-10 7:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-09-10 8:35 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-10 8:54 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B990AFF.2B2AD149@redhat.com \
--to=jsmith@redhat.com \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox