* Re: [PATCH} Minor bug fix in arch-utils.c [not found] <000701c0cea9$7b18ed80$6401a8c0@cn986452a> @ 2001-05-10 8:33 ` Andrew Cagney 2001-05-10 9:26 ` Fernando Nasser 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-05-10 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John S Kallal, Adam Mirowski; +Cc: gdb-patches > The following is a one line patch to > end a segmentation fault when the > command 'info architecture' is used > on GDB running on a SUSE-7.0 Linux > system. > > > 2001-04-26 John S Kallal <jskallal@home.com> > > * arch-utils.c/info_architecture: Remove 2nd > pointer list update to correctly follow > linked list. Yes, I've seen this patch twice now. While an obvious fix, I'm going to check in the attached. The ``info architecture'' command can simply be deleted. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH} Minor bug fix in arch-utils.c 2001-05-10 8:33 ` [PATCH} Minor bug fix in arch-utils.c Andrew Cagney @ 2001-05-10 9:26 ` Fernando Nasser 2001-05-10 10:27 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Fernando Nasser @ 2001-05-10 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: John S Kallal, Adam Mirowski, gdb-patches Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > The following is a one line patch to > > end a segmentation fault when the > > command 'info architecture' is used > > on GDB running on a SUSE-7.0 Linux > > system. > > > > > > 2001-04-26 John S Kallal <jskallal@home.com> > > > > * arch-utils.c/info_architecture: Remove 2nd > > pointer list update to correctly follow > > linked list. > > Yes, I've seen this patch twice now. While an obvious fix, I'm going to > check in the attached. The ``info architecture'' command can simply be > deleted. > > Andrew Ouch! Isn't it any useful? At least as a "maintenance" command? Fernando > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2001-05-09 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> > > * arch-utils.c (initialize_current_architecture): Delete obsolete > ``info architecture'' command. > > *** /home/scratch/GDB/src/gdb/arch-utils.c Tue May 8 11:58:38 2001 > --- arch-utils.c Wed May 9 16:17:00 2001 > *************** > *** 586,625 **** > show_architecture (NULL, from_tty); > } > > - /* Called if the user enters ``info architecture'' without an argument. */ > - > - static void > - info_architecture (char *args, int from_tty) > - { > - printf_filtered ("Available architectures are:\n"); > - if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH) > - { > - const char **arches = gdbarch_printable_names (); > - const char **arch; > - for (arch = arches; *arch != NULL; arch++) > - { > - printf_filtered (" %s", *arch); > - } > - xfree (arches); > - } > - else > - { > - enum bfd_architecture a; > - for (a = bfd_arch_obscure + 1; a < bfd_arch_last; a++) > - { > - const struct bfd_arch_info *ap; > - for (ap = bfd_lookup_arch (a, 0); > - ap != NULL; > - ap = ap->next) > - { > - printf_filtered (" %s", ap->printable_name); > - ap = ap->next; > - } > - } > - } > - printf_filtered ("\n"); > - } > - > /* Set the dynamic target-system-dependent parameters (architecture, > byte-order) using information found in the BFD */ > > --- 586,591 ---- > *************** > *** 759,767 **** > current setting. */ > add_cmd ("architecture", class_support, show_architecture, > "Show the current target architecture", &showlist); > - c = add_cmd ("architecture", class_support, info_architecture, > - "List supported target architectures", &infolist); > - deprecate_cmd (c, "set architecture"); > } > } > > --- 725,730 ---- -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH} Minor bug fix in arch-utils.c 2001-05-10 9:26 ` Fernando Nasser @ 2001-05-10 10:27 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-05-10 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: John S Kallal, Adam Mirowski, gdb-patches > Yes, I've seen this patch twice now. While an obvious fix, I'm going to >> check in the attached. The ``info architecture'' command can simply be >> deleted. >> >> Andrew > > > Ouch! Isn't it any useful? At least as a "maintenance" command? A while back I fixed set/show architecture vis: (gdb) show arch archdebug architecture (gdb) show architecture The target architecture is set automatically (currently rs6000:6000) (gdb) set architecture Requires an argument. Valid arguments are rs6000:6000, rs6000:rs1, rs6000:rsc, rs6000:rs2, powerpc:common, powerpc:603, powerpc:EC603e, powerpc:604, powerpc:403, powerpc:601, powerpc:620, powerpc:630, powerpc:a35, powerpc:rs64ii, powerpc:rs64iii, powerpc:7400, powerpc:MPC8XX, auto. (gdb) set architecture<TAB> auto powerpc:620 powerpc:a35 rs6000:rs1 powerpc:403 powerpc:630 powerpc:common rs6000:rs2 powerpc:601 powerpc:7400 powerpc:rs64ii rs6000:rsc powerpc:603 powerpc:EC603e powerpc:rs64iii powerpc:604 powerpc:MPC8XX rs6000:6000 compare this to info architecture: (gdb) info architecture Warning: command 'info architecture' is deprecated. Use 'set architecture' Available architectures are: rs6000:6000 rs6000:rs1 rs6000:rsc rs6000:rs2 powerpc:common powerpc:603 powerpc:EC603e powerpc:604 powerpc:403 powerpc:601 powerpc:620 powerpc:630 powerpc:a35 powerpc:rs64ii powerpc:rs64iii powerpc:7400 powerpc:MPC8XX so it is redundant. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-10 10:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <000701c0cea9$7b18ed80$6401a8c0@cn986452a>
2001-05-10 8:33 ` [PATCH} Minor bug fix in arch-utils.c Andrew Cagney
2001-05-10 9:26 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-05-10 10:27 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox