From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
To: jtc@redback.com
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com>,
Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A944D62.1AB25957@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5mg0h7u12i.fsf@jtc.redback.com>
"J.T. Conklin" wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com> writes:
> Michael> When you speak of a speed hit, are you speaking of
> Michael> symbol-file-load time, or expression evaluation time? I
> Michael> think expression evaluation is far less important to optimize
> Michael> for speed than symbol loading. Lots of people complain about
> Michael> the time gdb takes to start up on a new symbol file, while
> Michael> very few (that I'm aware of) complain about the performance
> Michael> during expression evaluation.
>
> Note that expression evaluation time isn't usually an issue for
> interactive use, but it becomes an issue in user defined functions
> that grovel around complicated data structures, etc.
Sure -- but not nearly so much an issue as in symbol loading, where
large symbol files may take minutes to load. And symbol loading must
be done for (nearly) every debugging session, whereas user defined
functions that grovel around complicated data structures are the exception.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-21 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-20 20:42 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-20 23:42 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-02-21 11:53 ` Michael Snyder
2001-02-21 14:24 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-21 15:21 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-21 7:43 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-20 17:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-20 19:42 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-02-21 10:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-21 13:03 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-02-21 13:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-21 15:19 ` Michael Snyder
2001-02-22 8:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-20 16:02 Daniel Berlin
2001-02-21 1:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-21 10:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-21 13:31 ` Daniel Berlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A944D62.1AB25957@cygnus.com \
--to=msnyder@cygnus.com \
--cc=chastain@cygnus.com \
--cc=dberlin@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jtc@redback.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox