Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: Fix file location for gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:46:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38f18a49-f283-45cb-9333-ee911ee76e73@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250120122608.115710-2-guinevere@redhat.com>

On 1/20/25 13:26, Guinevere Larsen wrote:
> The newly added test gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp had a
> problem in the call to gdb_comiple, that caused the .o files to be

Hi Gwen,

gdb_comiple -> gdb_compile

> outputted in the GDB file tree. This commit fixes the issues in the calls.
> 
> Reported-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>

I've tested this, and checked that it fixes the problem.

LGTM.

Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>

Thanks,
- Tom

> ---
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Sorry about that, this patch should fix it. I'm not sure if this counts
> as obvious, so I haven't pushed it yet, do let me know if this is ok :)
> 
> ---
>   .../gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp      | 14 +++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp
> index d6e686539c9..53bf642a92c 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp
> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
>   # trace goes through a function with no debug information.
>   
>   standard_testfile -caller.c -main.c
> -set objmainfile ${testfile}-main.o
> -set objcallerfile ${testfile}-caller.o
> +set objmainfile [standard_output_file ${testfile}-main.o]
> +set objcallerfile [standard_output_file ${testfile}-caller.o]
>   
>   # Recompile the inferior with or without CFI information, then run the
>   # inferior until the point where the important test starts.
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ proc prepare_test {has_cfi} {
>       if {$has_cfi} {
>   	set extension "cfi"
>   	if {[gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" \
> -	     "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${objcallerfile}" \
> +	     "${objcallerfile}" \
>   	     object [list {additional_flags=-fomit-frame-pointer \
>   		 -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables}]] != "" } {
>   	    untested "couldn't compile with cfi"
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ proc prepare_test {has_cfi} {
>       } else {
>   	set extension "no-cfi"
>   	if {[gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" \
> -	     "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${objcallerfile}" \
> +	     "${objcallerfile}" \
>   	     object [list {additional_flags=-fomit-frame-pointer \
>   		 -fno-unwind-tables \
>   		 -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables}]] != "" } {
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ proc prepare_test {has_cfi} {
>   	    return false
>         }
>       }
> -    if {[gdb_compile [list "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${objmainfile}" \
> -	    "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${objcallerfile}"] \
> +    if {[gdb_compile [list "${objmainfile}" \
> +	    "${objcallerfile}"] \
>   	    "${binfile}-${extension}" binfile {}] != ""} {
>   	untested "couldn't link object files"
>   	return false
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ proc prepare_test {has_cfi} {
>   }
>   
>   if {[gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile2}" \
> -	"${srcdir}/${subdir}/${objmainfile}" \
> +	"${objmainfile}" \
>   	object {debug}] != "" } {
>       untested "couldn't compile main file"
>       return


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-20 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-10 19:51 [PATCH v8 0/5] Modernize frame unwinders and add disable feature Guinevere Larsen
2024-12-10 19:51 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] gdb: make gdbarch store a vector of frame unwinders Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-14 14:28   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-01-14 20:34     ` Guinevere Larsen
2024-12-10 19:51 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] gdb: add "unwinder class" to " Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-14 15:28   ` Andrew Burgess
2024-12-10 19:51 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] gdb: Migrate frame unwinders to use C++ classes Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-14 17:13   ` Andrew Burgess
2024-12-10 19:51 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] gdb: introduce ability to disable frame unwinders Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-16 12:06   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-01-17 12:40     ` Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-17 13:55       ` Andrew Burgess
2025-01-17 14:47         ` Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-16 16:22   ` Andrew Burgess
2024-12-10 19:51 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] gdb/testsuite: Test for a backtrace through object without debuginfo Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-16 14:37   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-01-16 18:42     ` Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-17 13:58       ` Andrew Burgess
2025-01-18  8:07     ` Tom de Vries
2025-01-20 12:26       ` [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: Fix file location for gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-20 12:46         ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2025-01-20 12:48           ` Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-07 12:11 ` [PING][PATCH v8 0/5] Modernize frame unwinders and add disable feature Guinevere Larsen
2025-01-17 14:49 ` [PATCH " Guinevere Larsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38f18a49-f283-45cb-9333-ee911ee76e73@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=guinevere@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox