RE: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros

[Andrew Volkov <Andrew.Volkov@transas.com>]

Andreas, 

I think difference of c99 and ANSI is offtopic here. 
Are you have any suggestions about patch?

Andrey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Schwab [mailto:schwab@suse.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:21 PM
> To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to 
> REGNUM macros
> 
> 
> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
> 
> |> Further, it's general to talk about 'ISO' when referring 
> to c99.  I said 
> |> 'ANSI', which is usually taken to refer to the original standard.
> 
> I'm pretty sure that ANSI has adopted C99 too.  And C89 (well, C90
> actually) was an ISO standard as well.
> 
> |> And anyway, the important point here is that GDB is not 
> being coded to c99.
> 
> No sweat.
> 
> Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
> SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
> Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>