From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15551-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23318 invoked by alias); 15 May 2002 13:59:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23263 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 13:59:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO harvester.transas.com) (193.125.200.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 13:59:28 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harvester.transas.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 7E0BA6B825; Wed, 15 May 2002 17:59:27 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from clue.transas.com (clue.transas.com [10.0.0.42])
	by harvester.transas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1DA9F6B823; Wed, 15 May 2002 17:59:27 +0400 (MSD)
Received: by clue.transas.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <HSFPDN27>; Wed, 15 May 2002 17:59:27 +0400
Message-ID: <2E74F312D6980D459F3A05492BA40F8DDA42E7@clue.transas.com>
From: Andrew Volkov <Andrew.Volkov@transas.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: RE: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 06:59:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00599.txt.bz2

Andreas,=20

I think difference of c99 and ANSI is offtopic here.=20
Are you have any suggestions about patch?

Andrey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Schwab [mailto:schwab@suse.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:21 PM
> To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to=20
> REGNUM macros
>=20
>=20
> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
>=20
> |> Further, it's general to talk about 'ISO' when referring=20
> to c99.  I said=20
> |> 'ANSI', which is usually taken to refer to the original standard.
>=20
> I'm pretty sure that ANSI has adopted C99 too.  And C89 (well, C90
> actually) was an ISO standard as well.
>=20
> |> And anyway, the important point here is that GDB is not=20
> being coded to c99.
>=20
> No sweat.
>=20
> Andreas.
>=20
> --=20
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
> SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 N=FCrnberg
> Key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>=20