From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 7.4->7.5 Regression gdb.base/pending.exp with gdbserver [Re: [PATCH] Dynamic printf for a target agent]
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 02:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2625393.59PdMiRRzQ@qiyao.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120718191741.GA13886@host2.jankratochvil.net>
On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 09:17:41 PM Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> 2885fb01788703023acfeb2bade84c20d8723853 is the first bad commit
> commit 2885fb01788703023acfeb2bade84c20d8723853
> Author: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
> Date: Mon Jul 2 15:29:29 2012 +0000
> Add target-side support for dynamic printf.
>
> Running ./gdb.base/pending.exp ...
> FAIL: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 2
> FAIL: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 1
> FAIL: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 3 (the program
> exited)
>
> There is somehow missed a breakpoint, IIUC.
Hi,
This regression is caused by the following change,
On Monday, July 02, 2012 11:18:34 AM Stan Shebs wrote:
> @@ -2916,22 +2918,33 @@ process_point_options (CORE_ADDR point_a
>
> while (*dataptr)
> {
> - switch (*dataptr)
> + if (*dataptr == ';')
> + ++dataptr;
> +
> + if (*dataptr == 'X')
> {
> - case 'X':
> - /* Conditional expression. */
> - if (remote_debug)
> - fprintf (stderr, "Found breakpoint condition.\n");
> - add_breakpoint_condition (point_addr, &dataptr);
> - break;
> - default:
> - /* Unrecognized token, just skip it. */
> - fprintf (stderr, "Unknown token %c, ignoring.\n",
> - *dataptr);
> + /* Conditional expression. */
> + fprintf (stderr, "Found breakpoint condition.\n");
> + add_breakpoint_condition (point_addr, &dataptr);
> + }
> + else if (strncmp (dataptr, "cmds:", strlen ("cmds:")) == 0)
> + {
> + dataptr += strlen ("cmds:");
> + if (debug_threads)
> + fprintf (stderr, "Found breakpoint commands %s.\n", dataptr);
> + persist = (*dataptr == '1');
> + dataptr += 2;
> + add_breakpoint_commands (point_addr, &dataptr, persist);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + /* Unrecognized token, just skip it. */
> + fprintf (stderr, "Unknown token %c, ignoring.\n",
> + *dataptr);
> }
>
> /* Skip tokens until we find one that we recognize. */
> - while (*dataptr && *dataptr != 'X' && *dataptr != ';')
> + while (*dataptr && *dataptr != ';')
It seems incorrect to remove "*dataptr != 'X'" out of this condition checking.
With the breakpoint commands added, the Z packet becomes
"Z0xxxxXxxxx,Xxxxx;cmds:xxxxx"
When parsing this packet, in current (wrong) GDBserver, only the first
condition ('Xxxxx') in packet is added, and the rest of conditions are skipped,
which is a mistake.
The fix is just to revert this change. Regression tested on x86_64/gdbserver,
and these fails are fixed.
-FAIL: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 2
-FAIL: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 1
+PASS: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 2
+PASS: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 1
-FAIL: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 3 (the program exited)
+PASS: gdb.base/pending.exp: continue to resolved breakpoint 3
Regression tested on x86_64/native, no changes.
--
Yao (齐尧)
gdb/gdbserver:
2012-07-20 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* server.c (process_point_options): Stop at 'X' when parsing.
---
gdb/gdbserver/server.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
index 963d575..4e15b3c 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
@@ -2944,7 +2944,7 @@ process_point_options (CORE_ADDR point_addr, char **packet)
}
/* Skip tokens until we find one that we recognize. */
- while (*dataptr && *dataptr != ';')
+ while (*dataptr && *dataptr != 'X' && *dataptr != ';')
dataptr++;
}
*packet = dataptr;
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-20 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 1:10 [PATCH] Dynamic printf for a target agent Stan Shebs
2012-05-31 6:02 ` Yao Qi
2012-06-25 15:31 ` Stan Shebs
2012-06-27 20:45 ` Tom Tromey
2012-07-02 18:19 ` Stan Shebs
2012-07-18 19:18 ` 7.4->7.5 Regression gdb.base/pending.exp with gdbserver [Re: [PATCH] Dynamic printf for a target agent] Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-20 2:28 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2012-07-25 19:50 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-27 2:32 ` [committed]: " Yao Qi
2012-07-27 16:36 ` Pedro Alves
2012-07-28 10:24 ` Yao Qi
2012-07-28 11:41 ` Yao Qi
2012-07-02 16:41 ` Build regression on 64-bit hosts " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2625393.59PdMiRRzQ@qiyao.dyndns.org \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=stanshebs@earthlink.net \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox