Re: [RFA][3/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (the port itself)

["Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>]

>  I've tried but failed to make that work.  The problem is that both
>  ppc-linux-nat.c and spu-linux-nat.c are based on inf-ptrace.c, and
>  it is currently impossible to register two targets resulting from
>  inf_ptrace_create at the same time, due to the ptrace_ops_hack.

Duh.  Well, I guess we need to fix that then.

>  Appended below is the code I'm currently using.  It requires building
>  a native powerpc64 target with --enable-targets=spu (which is necessary
>  anyway to get spu BFD support, and now also triggers inclusion of
>  both spu-linux-nat.c on the host side and spu-tdep.c on the target
>  side).

Does this work as well as your previous diff?  I like this much better
and as far as I am concerned this can go in if you fix one minor nit:

>  gdb-head/gdb/config/powerpc/ppc64-linux-cell.mh
>  --- gdb-orig/gdb/config/powerpc/ppc64-linux-cell.mh	1970-01-01
>  01:00:00.000000000 +0100
>  +++ gdb-head/gdb/config/powerpc/ppc64-linux-cell.mh	2006-11-16
>  04:25:21.000000000 +0100
>  @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>  +# Host: Cell BE (PowerPC64 + SPU), running Linux
>  +
>  +XM_CLIBS=

Please get rid of this XM_CLIBS setting.  The same for linux-cell.mh.