From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] [gdb] Break up complex assignment in cp_lookup_symbol_via_imports
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 12:07:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415100738.1297583-2-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415100738.1297583-1-tdevries@suse.de>
In cp_lookup_symbol_via_imports, we have a complex assignment:
...
directive_match = (search_parents
? (startswith (scope, current->import_dest)
&& (len == 0
|| scope[len] == ':'
|| scope[len] == '\0'))
: streq (scope, current->import_dest));
...
Writing it like this makes it:
- harder to comment on parts of the expression, and also
- harder to understand and modify it.
Also, len == 0 makes the startswith redundant, so that part of the expression
can be hoisted. Doing so makes it clear that scope is not compared against in
all cases.
Fix this by breaking this up into three separate assignments:
...
if (search_parents)
{
if (len == 0)
directive_match = true;
else
directive_match = (startswith (scope, current->import_dest)
&& (scope[len] == ':'
|| scope[len] == '\0'));
}
else
directive_match = streq (scope, current->import_dest);
...
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
---
gdb/cp-namespace.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/cp-namespace.c b/gdb/cp-namespace.c
index c8cd5c245aa..1903287770b 100644
--- a/gdb/cp-namespace.c
+++ b/gdb/cp-namespace.c
@@ -394,7 +394,6 @@ cp_lookup_symbol_via_imports (const char *scope,
{
struct block_symbol sym = {};
int len;
- int directive_match;
/* All the symbols we found will be kept in this relational map between
the mangled name and the block_symbol found. We do this so that GDB
@@ -425,13 +424,21 @@ cp_lookup_symbol_via_imports (const char *scope,
do not use this directive. */
if (!current->valid_line (boundary_sal.line))
continue;
+
len = strlen (current->import_dest);
- directive_match = (search_parents
- ? (startswith (scope, current->import_dest)
- && (len == 0
- || scope[len] == ':'
- || scope[len] == '\0'))
- : streq (scope, current->import_dest));
+
+ bool directive_match;
+ if (search_parents)
+ {
+ if (len == 0)
+ directive_match = true;
+ else
+ directive_match = (startswith (scope, current->import_dest)
+ && (scope[len] == ':'
+ || scope[len] == '\0'));
+ }
+ else
+ directive_match = streq (scope, current->import_dest);
/* If the import destination is the current scope or one of its
ancestors then it is applicable. */
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 10:07 [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb/exp] Fix ignoring of incorrect namespace prefix Tom de Vries
2026-04-15 10:07 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2026-04-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] " Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260415100738.1297583-2-tdevries@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox