From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH] Adjust gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp for Cygwin
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 17:52:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250606165219.968227-1-pedro@palves.net> (raw)
Currently on Cygwin, I get:
Running /home/alves/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp ...
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=char: cond_eval=auto: multi-loc: continue
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=char: cond_eval=auto: single-loc: continue
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=short: cond_eval=auto: multi-loc: continue
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=short: cond_eval=auto: single-loc: continue
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=int: cond_eval=auto: multi-loc: continue
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=int: cond_eval=auto: single-loc: continue
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=long long: cond_eval=auto: multi-loc: continue
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=long long: cond_eval=auto: single-loc: continue
On GNU/Linux, we see:
Breakpoint 2.1, foo () at .../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.c:21
21 return 0; /* Multi-location breakpoint here. */
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=char: cond_eval=auto: multi-loc: continue
While on Cygwin, we see:
Thread 1 "bp-cond-failure" hit Breakpoint 2.1, foo () at .../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.c:21
21 return 0; /* Multi-location breakpoint here. */
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp: access_type=char: cond_eval=auto: multi-loc: continue
The difference is the "Thread 1" part in the beginning of the quoted
output. It appears on Cygwin, but not on Linux. That's because on
Cygwin, all inferiors are multi-threaded, because both Windows and the
Cygwin runtime spawn a few helper threads.
Fix this by adjusting the gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp testcase to
work with either single- or multi-threaded inferiors.
The testcase passes cleanly for me after this.
Change-Id: I5ff11d06ac1748d044cef025f1e78b8f84ad3349
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp
index d6454549b48..4d03e7bc5fe 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-cond-failure.exp
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ proc run_test { cond_eval access_type bpexpr nloc } {
"Error in testing condition for breakpoint ${bp_num}.2:" \
"Cannot access memory at address 0x0" \
"" \
- "Breakpoint ${bp_num}.2, foo \\(c=49 ...\\) at \[^\r\n\]+:\[0-9\]+" \
+ "(Thread \[^\r\n\]+ hit )?Breakpoint ${bp_num}.2, foo \\(c=49 ...\\) at \[^\r\n\]+:\[0-9\]+" \
"${::decimal}\\s+\[^\r\n\]+ breakpoint here\\. \[^\r\n\]+"]
} else {
gdb_test "continue" \
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ proc run_test { cond_eval access_type bpexpr nloc } {
"Error in testing condition for breakpoint ${bp_num}:" \
"Cannot access memory at address 0x0" \
"" \
- "Breakpoint ${bp_num}, bar \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+:\[0-9\]+" \
+ "(Thread \[^\r\n\]+ hit )?Breakpoint ${bp_num}, bar \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+:\[0-9\]+" \
"${::decimal}\\s+\[^\r\n\]+ breakpoint here\\. \[^\r\n\]+"]
}
}
base-commit: e9770f7889e72297a179b5596894f4bbdb105224
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 16:52 Pedro Alves [this message]
2025-06-06 17:21 ` Kevin Buettner
2025-06-09 16:39 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250606165219.968227-1-pedro@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox