* Re: Build failure on x32 (gdb 11.1) [not found] <20211121194556.nreowfixabal5ebj@pine> @ 2021-11-22 6:46 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches 2021-11-22 8:38 ` Jan Palus 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches @ 2021-11-22 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Palus, gdb-patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1133 bytes --] On 11/21/21 8:45 PM, Jan Palus wrote: > gdb 11.1 fails during compilation on x32 ABI: > > ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:280:42: error: 'struct compat_x32_siginfo_t::<unnamed union>::<unnamed>' has no member named 'si_addr_bnd' > 280 | #define cpt_si_lower _sifields._sigfault.si_addr_bnd._lower > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:337:38: note: in expansion of macro 'cpt_si_lower' > 337 | to->cpt_si_lower = from_ptrace.cpt_si_lower; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:281:42: error: 'struct compat_x32_siginfo_t::<unnamed union>::<unnamed>' has no member named 'si_addr_bnd' > 281 | #define cpt_si_upper _sifields._sigfault.si_addr_bnd._upper > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:338:38: note: in expansion of macro 'cpt_si_upper' > 338 | to->cpt_si_upper = from_ptrace.cpt_si_upper; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > I believe it is caused by https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3d7d1b Hi, I've attached a conservative fix, can you check whether that fixes the build breaker? Thanks, - Tom [-- Attachment #2: tmp.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 868 bytes --] diff --git a/gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c b/gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c index 342840e5085..fc52b5b6056 100644 --- a/gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c +++ b/gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c @@ -330,6 +330,9 @@ compat_siginfo_from_siginfo (compat_siginfo_t *to, const siginfo_t *from) to->cpt_si_pid = from_ptrace.cpt_si_pid; to->cpt_si_uid = from_ptrace.cpt_si_uid; } +#ifndef __ILP32__ + /* The struct compat_x32_siginfo_t doesn't contain + cpt_si_lower/cpt_si_upper. */ else if (to->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR && to->si_signo == SIGSEGV) { @@ -337,6 +340,7 @@ compat_siginfo_from_siginfo (compat_siginfo_t *to, const siginfo_t *from) to->cpt_si_lower = from_ptrace.cpt_si_lower; to->cpt_si_upper = from_ptrace.cpt_si_upper; } +#endif else if (to->si_code < 0) { to->cpt_si_pid = from_ptrace.cpt_si_pid; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Build failure on x32 (gdb 11.1) 2021-11-22 6:46 ` Build failure on x32 (gdb 11.1) Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches @ 2021-11-22 8:38 ` Jan Palus 2021-11-22 11:23 ` [pushed][gdb/build] Fix x86_64 x32 build Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jan Palus @ 2021-11-22 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom de Vries; +Cc: gdb-patches On 22.11.2021 07:46, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 11/21/21 8:45 PM, Jan Palus wrote: > > gdb 11.1 fails during compilation on x32 ABI: > > > > ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:280:42: error: 'struct compat_x32_siginfo_t::<unnamed union>::<unnamed>' has no member named 'si_addr_bnd' > > 280 | #define cpt_si_lower _sifields._sigfault.si_addr_bnd._lower > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:337:38: note: in expansion of macro 'cpt_si_lower' > > 337 | to->cpt_si_lower = from_ptrace.cpt_si_lower; > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:281:42: error: 'struct compat_x32_siginfo_t::<unnamed union>::<unnamed>' has no member named 'si_addr_bnd' > > 281 | #define cpt_si_upper _sifields._sigfault.si_addr_bnd._upper > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:338:38: note: in expansion of macro 'cpt_si_upper' > > 338 | to->cpt_si_upper = from_ptrace.cpt_si_upper; > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > I believe it is caused by https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3d7d1b > > Hi, > > I've attached a conservative fix, can you check whether that fixes the > build breaker? Thanks. That's essentially the same fix as the temporary workaround I came up with: http://git.pld-linux.org/?p=packages/gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=9f79cb7 and can confirm that it fixes the failure and build is successful on x32. > > Thanks, > - Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [pushed][gdb/build] Fix x86_64 x32 build 2021-11-22 8:38 ` Jan Palus @ 2021-11-22 11:23 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches @ 2021-11-22 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Palus; +Cc: gdb-patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1534 bytes --] On 11/22/21 9:38 AM, Jan Palus wrote: > On 22.11.2021 07:46, Tom de Vries wrote: >> On 11/21/21 8:45 PM, Jan Palus wrote: >>> gdb 11.1 fails during compilation on x32 ABI: >>> >>> ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:280:42: error: 'struct compat_x32_siginfo_t::<unnamed union>::<unnamed>' has no member named 'si_addr_bnd' >>> 280 | #define cpt_si_lower _sifields._sigfault.si_addr_bnd._lower >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >>> ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:337:38: note: in expansion of macro 'cpt_si_lower' >>> 337 | to->cpt_si_lower = from_ptrace.cpt_si_lower; >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:281:42: error: 'struct compat_x32_siginfo_t::<unnamed union>::<unnamed>' has no member named 'si_addr_bnd' >>> 281 | #define cpt_si_upper _sifields._sigfault.si_addr_bnd._upper >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >>> ../.././gdbserver/../gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:338:38: note: in expansion of macro 'cpt_si_upper' >>> 338 | to->cpt_si_upper = from_ptrace.cpt_si_upper; >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> I believe it is caused by https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3d7d1b >> >> Hi, >> >> I've attached a conservative fix, can you check whether that fixes the >> build breaker? > > Thanks. That's essentially the same fix as the temporary workaround I > came up with: > > http://git.pld-linux.org/?p=packages/gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=9f79cb7 > > and can confirm that it fixes the failure and build is successful on x32. Committed as attached below. Thanks, - Tom [-- Attachment #2: 0001-gdb-build-Fix-x86_64-x32-build.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1788 bytes --] [gdb/build] Fix x86_64 x32 build A build error on x86_64 with x32 abi was reported here ( https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/2021-November/049787.html ): ... gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:280:42: error: \ 'struct compat_x32_siginfo_t::<unnamed union>::<unnamed>' has no member \ named 'si_addr_bnd' 280 | #define cpt_si_lower _sifields._sigfault.si_addr_bnd._lower | ^~~~~~~~~~~ gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:337:38: note: in expansion of macro 'cpt_si_lower' 337 | to->cpt_si_lower = from_ptrace.cpt_si_lower; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ... The problem is that code added in commit d3d7d1ba3bb "[gdb/tdep] Handle si_addr_bnd in compat_siginfo_from_siginfo" doesn't compile on an x86_64 x32 setup, because compat_x32_siginfo_t doesn't have the si_addr_bnd fields. Fix this conservatively by disabling the code for x32. Tested on x86_64-linux. --- gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c b/gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c index 342840e5085..fc52b5b6056 100644 --- a/gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c +++ b/gdb/nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c @@ -330,6 +330,9 @@ compat_siginfo_from_siginfo (compat_siginfo_t *to, const siginfo_t *from) to->cpt_si_pid = from_ptrace.cpt_si_pid; to->cpt_si_uid = from_ptrace.cpt_si_uid; } +#ifndef __ILP32__ + /* The struct compat_x32_siginfo_t doesn't contain + cpt_si_lower/cpt_si_upper. */ else if (to->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR && to->si_signo == SIGSEGV) { @@ -337,6 +340,7 @@ compat_siginfo_from_siginfo (compat_siginfo_t *to, const siginfo_t *from) to->cpt_si_lower = from_ptrace.cpt_si_lower; to->cpt_si_upper = from_ptrace.cpt_si_upper; } +#endif else if (to->si_code < 0) { to->cpt_si_pid = from_ptrace.cpt_si_pid; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-22 11:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20211121194556.nreowfixabal5ebj@pine>
2021-11-22 6:46 ` Build failure on x32 (gdb 11.1) Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2021-11-22 8:38 ` Jan Palus
2021-11-22 11:23 ` [pushed][gdb/build] Fix x86_64 x32 build Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox